I have always known it is Murdoch, George Soros is, as many Republicans and large corporation do, exercising his Constitutional right to support the candidates of his choice.
2007-10-31 05:50:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well, I mean Murdoch owns all of the News Corporation, all of the Fox Channels, and Soros is just a bankroller, so I would say Murdoch, I mean I'm not saying Murdoch is a problem but I would say he's more influential. He's a millionaire, like Soros, and most millionaires have given money to both parties, Murdoch has, but Soros just decided to give money to Democrats. I think Republicans in general take Soros more seriously than anyone else, I think Democrats are basically like "thanks for the money", but don't consider him anything more than a bankroller, not a major voice in the party like some claim. But I'm not a fan of either.
2007-10-31 12:43:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Super Tuesday 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
True Murdoch is the worst for public manipulation, but Soros isn't exactly Mr Morality either.
Both couldn't be trsuted as far as they could be kicked up the rear- hang both the bastards and give their dirty money to the needy.
2007-10-31 12:42:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Soros operates behind the scenes, supporting Moveon.org among other things. At least with Murdoch, you know what you get.
2007-10-31 12:50:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by MoltarRocks 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Foreign born George Soros with his billions (not all rich people are Republicans) owns the Democratic party. I guess he's never heard of campaign finance reform. He throws millions at every candidate and cause he believes in, while we ordinary, American born people only get to vote and contribute a small amount of money to our causes. He is a danger to democracy.
BY THE WAY: I consider it a compliment when lefties give me a thumbs down.
You all know Murdoch's name. Do you know the names of the people running all the left-leaning "news" outlets? I didn't think so.
2007-10-31 12:41:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jeff A 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
The real problem is with Murdoch.His news outlets mix fact and opinion and it's hard to tell which is which. Soros picks an advocacy issue and openly goes at it.
2007-10-31 12:46:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Murdoch for knowingly pandering as a right-wing-biased news provider because people want to delude themselves.
2007-10-31 12:46:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
If Soros owned a major media outlet, I'd say it was a tie. But since he doesn't and Murdoch does, Rupert is the clear winner.
2007-10-31 12:39:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
5⤋
I don't answer to either man. I don't give a crap about either, and only fools allow themselves to be manipulated.
2007-10-31 12:45:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by mbush40 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
It's not my best buddy Dick Cheney, that's for sure!
2007-10-31 12:42:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋