Who the media is behind period . Those who wield the power of who is elected president are more important then anyones looks or principles .
Nixon was so Unattractive children were scared of him .
2007-10-31 04:47:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by TroubleMaker 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Federal Lobbyist $ and foreign contributions. Each yields influence and political juice = power.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/25/clinton-defends-her-lobbyist-money
http://news.independent.co.UK/world/americas/article3075691.ece
Fair and balanced?
Above's entry is equally effective. Once you can manipulate the Media you can attain all sorts of goals. ie: Best pal Rupert Murdoch. If you believe Fox News is a neo-con platform look again. Big business in ratings #'s being controversial. Just like reality TV.
2007-10-31 12:08:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Money, looks, voting record...and somewhere down the line are principles. And that can change with the wind.
2007-10-31 16:31:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by 2BFree 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Money but the question is of course which came first, the chicken or the egg. Sometimes the money might simply follow the candidate of choice to protect its interests, don't think that's positive but other times money might determine who's the most popular candidate and that's devastating if you want to have any form of Democratic government
2007-10-31 18:59:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Money makes the world go round. We all know George W. Bush did not win his first term. Money talked and now he is president.
2007-10-31 11:59:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by reg 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It' sall about the money honey!
(That's what my best buddy Dick told me to say.)
2007-10-31 11:56:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
$$$$$$$$$$$$$ And those who 'donate' are the winners.
2007-10-31 12:04:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋