would you add fuel to the fire by piling on more baseless accusations in a selfish attempt to prove that you were right all along, ..um...wrongly?
2007-10-29
21:45:41
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Faith
6
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
Kezwalk, may i clarify?
I speak of the McCanns being accused of murdering their Madeleine.
I agree that accusing them of neglect by leaving their babies unattended is justifiable.
2007-10-29
21:54:27 ·
update #1
Edit: Kezwalk, to link neglect to murder is not only inane, its cruel. They are 2 separate acts with a huge difference... that being... intent to harm.
2007-10-29
22:19:48 ·
update #2
Edit: Why you yelling Chris H???! There were reckless no doubt but they didn't "abandon" their babies...and you shouldn't accuse them so. Slate them for the neglect they are guilty of...they, themselves admit it...but leave accusations of murder & abandonment for the sleazy tabloids please.
2007-10-29
22:22:46 ·
update #3
Their moral indignation comes across in waves. I see they've dropped the "murderous McCanns" for the moment, but are now concentrating on the "Fund".
I don't agree with the neglect angle, but I can understand why people feel that way. I can also understand why people feel they murdered their child, although I don't agree with that either. And I can respect people who stick to that argument. But I do find it beneath contempt when people try to throw everything at them, playing golf, for example to somehow justify their previous arguments.
2007-10-29 23:09:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by True Blue Brit 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
The jury of public knowledge is often used by the media to stir up something. Most often it is referred to as " bowl"; and you know gravity plays a part here too. What used to be egg in the face is now ; well, you know and the same subject comes up at the dinner table, The " bowl" subject, they kind of go together. In one way and out the other. Everyone can hear what goes in and out, but not everyone can see the process. In the McCanns case; we can see the process and make our " independent observations" simply by reading the questions; It's a mind thing. I could go on but as in this word process, my words would only be seen as passing the gas.
2007-10-29 22:15:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think a record has been made of the ISPs of all of the haters who spit venom at this tragic couple. A police warrant can force Yahoo to reveal the credit card details of these people and from there they can be charged.
Legal action may happen and I hope it does
2007-10-29 22:36:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I agree and yet there are those who believe the unfounded accusations. What a strange world.
2007-10-30 03:59:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. Legal action can also be taken. However, I hope that they never read some of the crap that is written here.
2007-10-30 03:47:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Thank you Faith,you are a beacon of sanity in this very sad saga.All power to you
2007-10-29 22:56:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Charlotte's Dad 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
There is proof that the McCann's left their children unattended. There is proof that a 3 year old child is missing ergo the parents are guilt of gross neglect.
There is evidence that the parents left their twins in Portugal in the same resort where an alledged abduction took place to visit the Pope. Further neglect.
2007-10-29 21:49:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Two Pints Lager 4
·
2⤊
8⤋
I N THAT CASE THE ANSWER IS VERY SIMPLE........best ANSWER PLEASE.............I CHARGE THE MCCANNS WITHN RECKLESS ABANDONMENT. EDIT l am sorry, l thought l was answering a serious question,i did not realise that i had stumbled onto a Pro- McCann only answer page.l am truely sorry for daring to tell the truth about those two scumbags
2007-10-29 22:19:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
7⤋
If people start doubting you, turn round and say in the height of arrogance "Well, they probably did it anyway" that way people can't accuse you of sh*t stirring! and you look really dominant and in control
2007-10-29 21:50:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by ƒαηтαѕтι¢ ☞CAT☜ 7
·
3⤊
4⤋