scientifically speaking; what makes atheists people (scientists) think that the world came from meteor dusts?

Question

ok, i know there are many questions, a lot, and a lot of hipotesis and theories for each one of them, for example, darwin theory of monkeys or w/e, even so i dont trust the beggy of that one, is a good one, and it has sense, but really, what int the world can actually make them think that this world comes from some sort of meteor dust, there isnt any sense in saying that, theres no actual thing that can say where the heck did this world or humans came from, cuz even if darwin is right with the monkeys, where did they come from? i mean, there isnt any 50% theory on where what or how, but jesus christ, not space dust.

Answer 1

Let me state here for the record, that I am not an atheist, I believe in God; I just don't believe in wishful thinking.

You are implying here that the idea that God simply "called Earth into existence" makes much more sense, (even though it explains absolutely nothing!)

What use is an idea like that, if it doesn't tell us *exactly how* God did it? Are you the type of person that satisfies themselves with such "non-explanation explanations"?

Just because you do not understand a theory, doesn't mean it's not a valid one. I suggest you do some more reading.

Answer 2

I don't even know where to start with your questions.
First of all, you make the assumption that all scientists are atheists.Not true.(Only the smart ones are LOL)
It would be like saying all Theists are brain dead
(of course the truth is that only MOST of them are)
How much science have you actually studied?
There is a huge amount of EVIDENCE that the solar system and the planets formed from dust and matter and accreted
together over the course of billions of years.
Darwin's theory of evolution is solid proven science.
the way germs and bacteria mutate and even the variety of breeds of domestic dogs speaks to proven evolution.
Your question on the other hand speaks volumes to a LACK of evolution.
I am so happy for you that you hold a BELIEF in Christianity
something you were taught and you obviously never bothered to question.Its not even a majority religion in the world.
The beauty of science is that it IS questioned constantly until proven otherwise.
Scientists do not have to worship gravity to know it will be there tomorrow.This is a debate that has and will go on for centuries.To believe the universe is 6000 years old as the bible says is all good and fine for you.I tend to agree with proven scientific methods that date the Earth at 3&1/2 billion years and the universe at about 12 billion.

Answer 3

I even have an open recommendations approximately each little thing. i'm arranged to benefit everyone's claims, scientific or non secular. i'm continually arranged to evaluate the prospect that what i've got self assurance to be authentic may be incorrect. Are you? Do you have an open recommendations approximately different religions? Are you waiting to evaluate the prospect that Jesus grow to be not the son of God, or that the Koran is God's be conscious, or that there is not any God in any respect? I take place to think of that there is a few reality interior the multiverse type, because of the fact it type of feels to be an stylish answer to most of the massive questions, like the life of randomness interior the universe, the magnificent behaviour of debris on the quantum point, why the universe exists and why it type of feels to be tuned to offer clever existence. those are all observable, recordable, measurable phenomena. Superficially, thought in God might additionally look to respond to some enormous questions, like "why are we here?", yet once you supply it basically somewhat concept, it basically replaces those questions with greater questions, like "why is God there?". to a pair volume it does come all the way down to non-public decision. To me, a godless multiverse is straightforward, stylish and beautiful; faith is complicated, contradictory, arbitrary and contrived.

Answer 4

Why do you presume that all scientists are atheists? It isn't true you know. I personally know loads of scientists that believe in god, they just don't believe that the bible is exact. I know several very convinced christian scientists. Maybe you wouldn't consider them christian because they do not accept the obviously mythological aspects of genesis, for example, but that is an argument you should raise with them. I am sure they have very good reasons for thinking what they do.

Einstein believed in god, just to name one very very famous scientist and I could fill this page with the names of non-atheist scentists. Some scientists look at the evidence of beauty and symmetry in the workings of the universe as personal proof for the existence of god. I am not one of them, but I wouldn't call myself an atheist either. I guess agnostic would be the best term.

I'm not even gonna bother to go through the litany of reasons why accretion theory for planetary formation makes a lot of sense. You obviously wouldn' t accept it anyway.

Answer 5

Becuase the notion of a man upstairs creating an entire planet complete with complex ecosystems in 6 days sounds ridiculous. The way stars & planets behave today by sweeping areas of space free of dust & debris & adding them to their mass is no different to how the first bits of dust & rock gravitated towards eachother.

Answer 6

I am a scientist.

I am not an atheist.

I know lots of scientists. Only 2 of them are atheists.

Don't generalize.

Answer 7

well you just cant help it that people were once apes and you are sad cause of that and if the scientist say the sun is purple then hey its purple.

Answer 8

Google for "argument from incredulity" and go from there.

Answer 9

Uh...and what exactly IS your question?