I can tell you what is their BS excuse for this war.
"9/11 changed everything"
2007-10-29 12:53:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
The answer to that is easy! That was a democratic president. If you listen to these two birds you will realize that everything that is going wrong with this country right now or in the past or in the future can be laid at the feet of democrats. If you want to be honest, no democrat is right all the time or wrong all the time. The same holds true for a republican. I even heard Limbaugh blame Clinton for the bad weather we were having. Have we all lost our ability for reasoning? These two guys are "same old, same old". nothing ever changes with them.
2007-10-29 20:32:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by peepers98 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's simple, at that time, no one fought Al Qaeda better than the Serbs. Why were we against the Serbs? They were kicking some muslim butt. They were kicking some Nazi Croat butt too.
It was also a violation of the NATO Charter to attack the Serbs. That means a violation of the US Constitution. The real kicker was, our Congress did not approve it, at all. Even the invasion of Iraq got Congressional support. Our Congress woke up, read the paper and discovered that we were attacking a little Balkan country. The Serbs were the good guys in the fight, we should have supported them, not attack them.
One bright spot in the whole affair though, the bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. That was so hilarious.
2007-10-29 21:35:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
They do this to divide. Make one side seem evil and the other good. Whichever side you agree with is the "good side" for you. We need to judge on the same scale. If something is bad, everything equal to that is equally bad. If it was a conservative who called for a war in Kosovo, conservative talkshow hosts would be for it.
2007-10-29 20:38:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Timothy C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, because Clinton was president. If as republican had done exactly the same as Clinton they would have been in favor.
Hannity is against any prochoice candidate expect it's OK for Guiliani to be pro choice because he's a republican.
See how it works?
2007-10-29 19:55:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Partisan Politics.
2007-10-29 19:51:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Because it served no purpose to be bombing a country that was not funding and supporting terrorism. Wasn't a threat to US national security and was not threatening its neigbors.
2007-10-29 21:41:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Two reasons ....First Clinton did what was right................plus Haliburton couldn't make any money from it!
2007-10-29 20:00:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by honestamerican 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
They are like politicians and flip flop depending who is doing what.
2007-10-29 19:51:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Edge Caliber 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
it was a lively discussion
2007-10-29 19:56:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Will 5
·
0⤊
0⤋