2007-10-29 10:08:13 · 27 answers · asked by Uhlan 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He's the worst any term president, no need to narrow down the list.
2007-10-29 10:29:24 · answer #1 · answered by The President 3 · 4⤊ 8⤋
Let's review....
2 tax rebate checks
tax reductions for all working people
no attacks after 9/11, but we had 6 attacks under Clinton
FBI, CIA, and police can now share files, they couldnt' before
2 enemy countries toppled
2 NEW Democracies in the world - 2 less dictatorships
2 new allies in the Middle East
2 new places to have military bases
Women and minorities voting in Afganistand and Iraq - took America 144 years to get this far.
No more rape squads in Iraq
MANY terrorist plots foiled and stopped
Oil for Food scandal exposed - Iraq, France, and UN shown to be the crooks we knew they were
No "scandal of the hour" like we had with Clinton
I'm going to say this..... there ARE some things I can say bad about GW Bush, but the truth is.... he's done a LOT of successful things and is FAR from the worst president we've had.
2007-10-29 17:19:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
I dunno, there was a multiple term president that ended up imprisoning thousands of Americans against their will, imposed a tax on every american that created the welfare society, and he even "allowed" us to be attacked on our own soil.
And there was also Nixon, though despite watergate he was actually a very productive president.
The whole "worst/best" thing is just about 100% emotional when talking abotu presidents from the last 30 years, let history give it some perspective. And let the talking heads pretend like they are the "end all be all" on this matter.
But he's defintiely top-3
2007-10-29 17:12:31 · answer #3 · answered by Phil M 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
His only competition as a two term President would be Ullysses S. Grant. Carter by the way was a one term President. Grant while a very President was at least a great General.
2007-10-29 17:15:12 · answer #4 · answered by David S 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Wow, a variation in the daily boredom.
"Two term" -brimming difference. NOT.
Let's state some positive about him:
Halloween, that dumb&disgusting vietnam
deserter coward can go out without mask.
2007-10-29 17:20:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
bush is by far the best C-average, pretzel choking, coke-snorting, idiot we've had..
who in gods name waves at stevie wonder.. i mean common now.
he also told america that "most of our imports come from other countries" in a speech where that wasn't even on his script from the speech writer
he's done a lot because he's had to but he's by far the biggest oaf we've had in the white house and has just about doubled our national debt in his two terms.
2007-10-29 17:27:23 · answer #6 · answered by abesegal 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I don't know if he is the worst in history, but I dislike his inability to secure borders and keep manufacturing jobs in the United States. I do, however, respect his dedication to national security.
2007-10-29 17:12:01 · answer #7 · answered by negaduck 6 · 10⤊ 2⤋
Carter was the worst. He was so bad, it felt like two terms, so he's my vote. Unlike Bush who brought us through the fastest and strongest economic recovery in American history, Carter was even worse at economics than he was at letting the Middle East kill us.
2007-10-29 17:12:46 · answer #8 · answered by Stop Ranting 5 · 6⤊ 5⤋
No. He is a reflection of our times. FDR was the most manipulative, thank God.
The least successful two termer was also the most intelligent man to ever hold the office, Woodrow Wilson.
Teddy Roosevelt was a world shaker. You tell me if it is a better world or not.
TD
2007-10-29 17:26:23 · answer #9 · answered by TD Euwaite? 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Clinton was worse. FDR proved catastrophic in the long term, but he gets a pass because he won the war.
Bush will be remembered as a great president.
2007-10-29 17:23:11 · answer #10 · answered by Skooz 4 · 3⤊ 6⤋
not 2 or 1 term.....just worst.
2007-10-29 17:26:35 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋