Have u seen 9/11 loose change?

Question

If so, do you think it's true? Was it an inside job? If you haven't seen it go watch it on You Tube.

Answer 1

Yes, I've seen it.

I think parts of it were true. I think it was a partial inside job. The government knew it was coming, but didn't do anything to stop it. I base that reasoning mostly on the fact that the government isn't releasing all of the facts and is highly secretive.

Answer 2

Not a chance. The ability to do what they say is crazy. Steel does melt...and JP-5 does get hot enough to do it. Not that I am saying that the government does not keep stuff from people...But no people Islamic radicals want to kill Americans and others that do not believe in what they believe.
Now before I get jumped.. :) Note the choice of words. Islam is a peaceful religion...Now the Catholics need to take a peek back at their religion too. :)

Answer 3

no, i haven't but i do think 9/11 was an inside job. good luck.

Answer 4

I don't need to watch that silly video to know that 9/11 was NOT an inside job.

Answer 5

9/11 was suspicious. I won't go as far as saying it was an inside job, but I'm not convinced that it wasn't.

Answer 6

It only has a few good points. For the most part though its just a bunch of kids with an editing program and internet resources.

Answer 7

Yeah I saw it. It's just 2 teenage american oiks with nothing better to do.

Answer 8

It's a collection of lies and misrepresentations meant to sucker in gullible people.

Every published expert in the world has come out against the “scientific” arguments of the conspiracy theorists. There isn’t a single article published in support of the conspiracy theory.

Here are reports of real experts, not 2 teenagers who know who to make a movie:

-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

--NIST (National Institute on Science and Technology):
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Also see the lead investigator of NIST explain the collapse at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
Click on "Impact to Collapse"

-- The leading demolition journal in the world is against the conspiracy theorists:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

--Professor Bazant (Northwestern Dept of Civil Engineering) is one of only 14 people to win the Prager Award in engineering. He first described the collapse mechanism as follows: http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf

--FEMA along with American Society of Civil Engineers, did an extensive analysis of the WTC collapse (ASCE/FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study (BPS) Team)
http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm
It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm

-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article citing 300 renowned experts in demolition & engineering.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

--The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000

Answer 9

I watched it. It's not the best comedy I've ever seen, but I would put it in the top ten.

Answer 10

As good as the argument looks, it just does not seem plausible at all.