English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

Republicans think so. If they can't afford the medical bills, they shouldn't have gotten sick.

2007-10-29 08:42:21 · answer #1 · answered by buffytou 6 · 5 4

Depends on the circumstances, but usually not.

You are only fiscally irresponsible if you go BK over debt you could've prevented. Most serious health situations that escalate people into BK are beyond human control and unpreventable in most cases.

With that said, if you can afford good health insurance that provides complete coverage, and you choose not to have it, you are fiscally irresponsible. Medical debt is preventable to those who can afford good health insurance. of course, many people cannot afford health insurance.

2007-10-29 08:50:47 · answer #2 · answered by Ian D 5 · 0 0

You are kidding right?
You might want to go to a cancer ward once in your life and get a perspective from a family being ravaged by BIG HOSPITALS and INSURANCE COMPANIES while having to deal with life and death.

How dare you be so callous with the misfortune of others.
It is entirely possible that your position exists but to brush a broad stroke and say people who are financially destroyed by medical bills are irresponsible is SHAMEFUL.

May you never have to experience such hardship.
Karma is a very powerful and real existence, you are tempting it with your insensitivity.

2007-10-29 09:29:15 · answer #3 · answered by Mr realistic...believer in truth 6 · 0 0

Of course they aren't. We all should pay into 1 system since health care is a necessity. It should not be not for profit. It's the right thing to do. Preventative health care and education and living healthier lives are the keys to decreasing costs. The poor have the least access to preventative health care and education. They cannot afford to eat better because healthy food is expensive. The poor are not sophisticated. I have been taught how to shop well. But I know that others aren't as lucky. It's not necessarily intuitive. We pay for our politicians and other government employees to have health care for life so why shouldn't all Americans get the same benefits. Why should I have to pay for Clinton's health care? Why should I have to pay for retired government employees' healthcare? I'm not covered when I retire. I have to pay myself. We all should have to pay something. Over time, our health care costs will go down. We should be focused more on quality of life and not so much on quantity of life.

2007-10-29 09:03:02 · answer #4 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 0 0

Americans have to file bankruptcy or sacrifice their health. I can't wait for next year's elections! No, and it makes the Insurance Companies worse than Loan Sharks. Where's the Fiscally Irresponsible government so ANXIOUS to give Medical Care to Illegal Aliens? Our families can't afford adequate legal council but they give it freely to foreigners?

2007-10-29 08:43:37 · answer #5 · answered by ShadowCat 6 · 2 0

Not at all. With the skyrocketing costs of healthcare, it's easy for even the most fiscally responsible family to be overwhelmed by debt from medical bills.

2007-10-29 08:42:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Unfortunately that's the choice facing many poor or near-poor in this country. As a result, many seek medical care only when it is a life-or-death situation - making the health care they receive even more expensive than it would have been had they received treatment earlier. Of course, this raises insurance rates, or taxes for those treated without health care, on the rest of us.

2007-10-29 08:46:22 · answer #7 · answered by El Duderino 4 · 2 0

No. And many other folks who go bankrupt are not fiscally irresponsible.

2007-10-29 09:17:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Which began below Reaganomics and the removal of duty. The Republicans created the economic financial disaster and the courts have ruled that no person is to blame for something. Marriage is the circulate of possession of a female from her father or male dad or mum to a distinctive male for breeding applications in substitute for valuta so any marriage no longer in line with it is invalid. supply up you whining and initiate working to make the worldwide a extra useful place. by using ways, no elected guy or woman has any comprehension of finance. They do what they are advised by using their vendors.

2016-11-09 20:03:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What some conservatives don't realize is that an illness doesn't care how much money you have.

An illness can cause someone to be unable to work.

Retired people and children get diseases.

Insurance companies don't care if you have an illness, they care only about the bottom line for shareholders.

And for the same tired argument of "I don't want to pay for someone else who is too lazy to work" obviously never thought about retirees and children.

Yet they would be the first in line for a handout if they needed one.

2007-10-29 08:47:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Hell no, one trip to the hospital is all it takes to go bankrupt. Two weeks in the hospital can cost $250,000. It's not their fault. Medical costs in the US are the highest in the world, so are drug costs.

2007-10-29 08:45:35 · answer #11 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers