Hillary is sending emissaries around the world to let them know what US policy is going to be like when she takes over.
One of her campaign advisors just said she is prepared to tell them that she we pull out of Iraq. Does this approach aid and abet the enemy? Can they plan accordingly and just wait it out?
I just heard this on the news now so, internet sources to follow.
2007-10-29
07:31:06
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Common Sense: PAY ATTENTION I said 'is sending' not 'did send'. Besides, even if she did this after election and prior to inauguration, it's at the very least, bad form. Something her husband had enough sense not to do. She is opening the door with a license for every politician with an agenda to go off on foreign policy adventures of their own while she is president, god forbid.
Besides, the damage is done just by opening her mouth now. Do you really think we are the only ones who can hear her? Snap out of it.
2007-10-29
07:55:06 ·
update #1
Zeal: Please take your preaching elsewhere, it's offensive.
2007-10-29
07:57:50 ·
update #2
Think about it this way.
In the lead up to this Armenian genocide legislation Turkey hired several lobby groups to represent their thoughts to our congress. It makes sense that if she goes on an under the radar world tour promoting ideas that those nations are favorable to she could benefit from additional press in her favor. More lobbyists at least friendly to if not actively for her. Just imagine what you might achieve in the election process if Turkey thought you would support its attacks on the PKK. Or any number of countries that have people here in the USA that vote as their country requests. Armenians vote as a huge block.
Just a thought.
2007-10-29 17:10:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It makes me ill. Is America that fried that we are going to elect Hillary? I think not. She's already wearing yoke on her face like Monica did on her dress. Hill's got emassaries up the ying yang.
I hope that she crawls into her hole after getting shut down.
Praise be to Saint Hillary ... RALPH.
It was Ruddy who criticized her for that pontification. He is right on the mark.
The scary thing is that it might happen ... just like O.J. getting off. BOO ... Happy Halloween. Freaky.
2007-10-29 20:31:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know what the enemy might be getting from all this, but one thing is for sure the God who created the heavens and the earth is still in control of this nation, not Hillary. Trust in the Lord Jesus Christ, and seek Him for who needs to be put into the next presidential office.
2007-10-29 14:50:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by zeal 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
We expect her to show greater sense and sensibility in handling Iraq policy than her predecessors. She should withdraw American troops in an organized way to ensure that chaos and confusion do not follow the withdrawal. A planned, progressive with drawl will be inevitable because (a) the longer US occupation lasts the greater will the problems multiply for US, and (b) the US has eventually to leave Iraq in her own interests.
2007-10-29 14:57:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by salar a 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
You make a good point. However, Hillary has said one thing and done the other so many times that she has lost all credibility. People who take her at her word are being foolhardy.
2007-10-29 14:39:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Salar~ And I'm sure she'll do just that. You know, depending on who she's talking to at the moment.
And then free health care for terrorists!
2007-10-29 15:20:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Darth Scorn 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
She mlust step down and after slapping Iowa and Mississippi, she has lost South, never had and Midwest, which will hurt her. Good she is dealing with the enemy.
2007-10-29 14:38:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by R J 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
She has NOT sent emissaries around the world yet. As for pulling out of Iraq, she told Tim Russert that she would not pull out until 2013. What you "heard" is a figment of your imagination. PAY ATTENTION!!
2007-10-29 14:40:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by commonsense 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
Awful presumptuous of her, to fore-go the election and the sitting President and decide what policy is going to be without even talking to advisers and the joint chiefs.... is this a glimpse of what it is going to be like under dictator Hillary, I think so..
2007-10-29 14:37:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by libsticker 7
·
9⤊
2⤋
Didn't BushFraud just declare himself the winner before he was elected too? I think they call it predictive programming.
2007-10-30 00:13:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋