Poor people are just inferior and got that way because they are lazy or dumb
People who were not smart enough or fortunate enough to be able to pay for a Dr should just die quietly
The people should be happy to work for just enough to survive on Thats all the masses are good for anyway
Setting up exonomic barriers to legal representation keeps us safer from the neanderthals that roam the streets and putting them to work while in jail makes sense they owe us labour anyway
2007-10-29
07:09:43
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
The Webster's dictionary definition of
Feudalism
stands as a reminder for those who still think objectively:
...3: control by an entrenched minority esp. for its own benefit : social, political, or economic oligarchy.
2007-10-29
08:02:12 ·
update #1
Well thought out...
i agree
the elite vs the rest of us
it is wierd to see average poor and middle class people supporting the elite over themselves.....
2007-10-29 07:12:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
This is a well thought out doctrine of the modern day liberals. Think about it. Charlie Rangel want the mother of all tax increases. This is the framework for the Hillary tax increase. Why does the government want this money because people are dumb and lazy and we want to keep them poor. If you cannot afford health insurance then die. We will give you insurance and we get to make the rules. Lastly, this tax increase will be one of the biggest economic barriers to move to a higher class, get legal representation, become educated etc. Nice of you to point out the liberal agenda.
By the way lib is spelled 'L' 'I' 'B' not 'C' 'O' 'N'
2007-10-29 14:18:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by ken 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Probably in that in a feudal system there was absolutely no way for a serf to advance to a noble.
Conservative thought says go to school, handle yourself intelligently, rise through the ranks and earn wealth.
Some people are born into wealth, but some people are too stupid to manage it and fall out of wealth. It is not static.
Please be more intelligent in the future.
2007-10-29 14:16:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by You are all, weirdos. 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
What's with this rhetoric?
This is a perfect example of the divisiveness in this country. How old are you? I made $7,000 my first year in business, and now that my company has grown, the government treats me like an ATM. Wait until you realize what's going on in this country once you start to make a living.
2007-10-29 14:14:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Or the liberal view - "The rich got that way by stealing, not by working hard, and therefore should pay more for everything. The poor must have gotten that way by layoffs from the rich, or by getting screwed by the big bad evil government."
2007-10-29 14:14:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Feudal serfs paid 10% of their income in taxes and were considered slaves.
2007-10-29 14:28:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Skooz 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
What are you talking about? You have know idea what a NeoCon is and what it is about. Simply put, a NeoCom is a liberal that became a conservative because the Democrats were going to far to the left. Peace
2007-10-29 14:21:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by PARVFAN 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
And the neo-libs think that the poor are too stupid to care for themselves so they will get the government to do it for them. The strange thing is you people don't consider that insulting or degrading or elitist. Furthermore, most Republicans are more than willing to help out people who need it but not for generations because we believe that they ARE capable of caring for themselves.
Oh...and since you're Canadian, (labour?), it's really none of your business anyway.
2007-10-29 14:17:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Wow... I think you have absolutely no idea what Feudalism is.
I don't think you have much of a handle on reality either.
2007-10-29 14:19:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jon M 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
agreed.
elitism usually shows itself in the same predictable ways. you forgot to mention their feudalistic tendency to call tragic acts of nature punishments from god.
2007-10-29 14:20:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Free Radical 5
·
0⤊
2⤋