Think long and hard about this one....
2007-10-29 05:36:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Preemptive attack...is it me...or were we already IN Iraq when Kerry was running..or flip-flopping...whatever..
2007-10-29 05:44:51 · update #1
Yeah, I hear ya about the extended deployments, my husband just started a fifteen monther...gonna miss his daughters first halloween, thanksgiving, xmas..etc...
2007-10-29 05:52:50 · update #2
probably not, the damage was already done. but i hope someone figures out how to get our people outta there safely soon.
2007-10-29 05:51:00 · answer #1 · answered by KISS MY neice33 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For one factor Bush became into not AWOL and recieved an honorable discharge on leaving the provider. Al Gore's wrestle adventure consisted of spending 13 months in a 5 action picture star lodge in Saigon. Kerry spent 3 months in country have been given 3 crimson hearts (decrease than very mind-blowing circumstances) then got here homestead and consorted with the persons we've been struggling with. Oh have been given a wide-spread Discharge that he had to have upgraded via Carter. not precisely the "wrestle adventure" i seem for in a President.
2016-12-15 11:34:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No doubt. Quite simply because Kerry is intelligent enough to not lead a preemptive attack on a sovereign nation that posed no threat to America.
When the nation reelected Dubya they deserved the lies and the corruption that was inherent within his administration.
Time has shown Bush to be no more than a corrupt lying whore. I can blow my own horn as I was stating this since prior to his theft of the 2000 Presidential election.
EDIT:
Preemptive attack...is it me...or were we already IN Iraq when Kerry was running..or flip-flopping...whatever.."
Well we were in Iraq due to the incompetence of Bush. Flip flop, how original. But please remember, Kerry served 2 tours, earning 3 purple hearts, a silver and a bronze star. Bush didn't serve but earned an arrest record. Nice.
2007-10-29 05:42:43 · answer #3 · answered by kenny J 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think he would have made a better decision about Iraq and about gas prices for the future and what about how long are troops have been in Iraq and not getting people back or at least let those people get a brake because there is people that's been there from last thanks giving now thats sad.
yes i think john kerry would have made a huge difference.
2007-10-29 05:48:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. We don;t want to leave Iraq without fulfilling our national obligation to the country that we have ousted of a horrible leader, though destabilizing the country and offered up America to humiliation.
2007-10-29 05:40:13 · answer #5 · answered by BHS Via Sol 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
My cat would've done a better job in Iraq than Bush!!
2007-10-29 05:39:46 · answer #6 · answered by Kita 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I think it would've all came out the same.
2007-10-29 05:48:22 · answer #7 · answered by Jayna 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We wouldn't even be IN Iraq if we had someone other than Emperor Bush.
EDIT: My my my -- five thumbs down for little ole me! Looks like lots of folks think what they get from Fox News is the truth. Well don't cry to me when Bush bombs Iran -- and Russia and/or China bomb US in order to finally stop that demented, evil demon in the Oval Office.
2007-10-29 05:39:17 · answer #8 · answered by The Snappy Miss Pippi Von Trapp 7 · 4⤊ 6⤋
not if he had the same congress, think about that long and hard, WAIT ITS NOT THAT HARD ,ONE MAN DON`T RUN THE USA.....
2007-10-29 05:41:56 · answer #9 · answered by jimmiejet 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no he wouldve drafted everyone or not done a thing
bush has brought almost total sucess to iraq but not afghanistan
2007-10-29 05:40:35 · answer #10 · answered by Daniel S 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋