2007-10-29 03:34:14 · 5 answers · asked by needliberty 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Depends on what you classify as individual and group rights. Essentially most rights are individual even if they are "obtained" by being a member of a group.
Ultimately, I'd say individual rights are more important.
2007-10-29 03:41:31 · answer #1 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Indviduals form groups , so the more rights individuals get the more rights groups get ..
However, I believe group/community rights are more important.
2007-10-29 03:39:39 · answer #2 · answered by shdtt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is not any such ingredient as a 'team' without persons. 'team' is an abstraction. Like 'woodland' vs 'trees.' confirm individual rights, and 'team' rights would be risk-free as properly. yet to eliminate individual rights for the stable of the 'team' is insanity, because of fact communities are no longer people, they're precis suggestions, basically persons have rights. The term 'extra suitable stable' sounds advantageous yet regrettably it has in lots of situations been used to justify atrocities. preserve individual rights in any respect expenditures.
2016-10-14 07:55:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very ethical
It can depend on how the person views the situation and in most instances the gains they can receive.
Two views you can research are the Ultatarian and the Indivualism Approach to learn more
2007-10-29 03:43:24 · answer #4 · answered by Y_aurora 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More specific details are needed in order to form a more accurate opinion.
2007-10-29 04:30:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋