Would the restaurant still have to serve them?
2007-10-29 03:32:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Dining Out ➔ Other - Dining Out
Why don't you try it and let us know the outcome?
2007-10-29 04:50:34 · answer #1 · answered by Otto 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've always thought that one went without saying, but I'm positive the restaurant would not have to serve them.
2007-10-29 03:54:26 · answer #2 · answered by Doodles 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
depending on the resturant and the area they could get arrested or a severe warning, unless its a small town then its " Boy don't make me call yo mama!" Or the resturaunt might pass it off as a joke and serve ya anyway.
2007-10-29 17:05:42 · answer #3 · answered by pinkleo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt they would be served. However just because they aren't wearing pants does not mean they are exposing themselves. They could have on briefs or speedo.
2007-10-29 07:27:29 · answer #4 · answered by ziggy_brat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because that would fall under indecent exposure, and the person would be arrested. If there were children in the restaurant at the time, the charges would prob. be even more serious. I wouldn't recommend trying it.
2007-10-29 04:30:55 · answer #5 · answered by vgleason_102301 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, because no pants would mean exposing sexual organs which is illegal. :)
2007-10-29 03:40:12 · answer #6 · answered by JenWales 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that could be intresting but I am sure illegal
2007-10-29 16:11:02 · answer #7 · answered by what did you say 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, THEY WOULD CALL THE LAW INSTEAD! THOSE B@STARDS!!!
2007-10-29 04:21:53 · answer #8 · answered by pennylane 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋