All their arguements are logocal fallicies in this case the appeal to pity. So do liberal Democrats have abortions fo rthe Childern, I.E. appeal t o pity?
2007-10-29 02:39:24 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Michael F I forced to seek help many n that field quit their job due to our iunteractions, hommie don't play.
Also as a s result of the quote help I disowned my family..
Now you know the rest of the story.
2007-10-29 02:58:23 · update #1
oh god your one sick puppy! You need to see someone about how your mind works............ get help now!!!!!
PSYou also need help with your spelling....
2007-10-29 02:46:28 · answer #1 · answered by Michael F 3 · 6⤊ 4⤋
1) You can't lump liberal Democrats into one general child-aborting stereotype.
2) 'All' their arguments? Or just 'some' that you noticed?
3) Democrats and Republicans and all the other political people out there have their own opinions (varying by the PERSON, not the party) on whether abortion should be legal, and why. The real justification or condemnations for abortion should be based on its effect on society and the health of a nation economically and politically, NOT on individual morals. It's a mistake to expect government to regulate morals. Government should put the structure in place so that people can safely and healthfully behave in a way that agrees with their moral and cultural values AND contributes to the society as a whole.
2007-10-29 09:45:44 · answer #2 · answered by BZR 4 · 5⤊ 4⤋
What? Maybe you should do some research about Roe vs. Wade. Do you even know what was happening in the U.S. prior to Roe vs. Wade? It sounds like you haven't a clue.
Maybe you should go see Gone Baby Gone.
For me, I would never have an abortion. I wouldn't put myself in that situation. But I grew up in a wonderful family and received an excellent education. Other people are not so fortunate. I am a strong advocate for education for all people. That is the key to reducing the number of abortions performed. My mom had an abortion. (4th child) It was not an easy decision for her to make. She has to live with it. I'm sure some people can do it and not care. But most can't. Most aren't that heartless.
So you want more people on welfare? Aren't there enough already?
If only life was so simple. It's not. It never has been.
2007-10-29 09:49:06 · answer #3 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
There is no possible logical fallacy in the belief that the state does and should not own women's bodies.
Oh, and most democrats could probably spell L-O-G-I-C-A-L. : )
2007-11-01 20:48:39 · answer #4 · answered by Elizabeth J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do republicans all speak bad english? Do republicans feel destroying a cell which does not have feelings or emotions worse than killing thousands of iraqi childern who do?
2007-10-29 10:00:28 · answer #5 · answered by desiguyinatlanta 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Stop using the term logical fallacy. You do not know what they are.
2007-11-01 10:29:04 · answer #6 · answered by Kevy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I find it amusing that neo-cons are so passionate about aborition, yet have no problems sending living children to die in pointless wars. Your spelling and grammar do credit to the right wing.
By "Wraith of God", do you mean "Wrath of God", or do you imagine yourself to be a wraith, like in Lord of the Rings? Spoken like a true conservative Christian. I'm sure you make Jesus proud.
Down with education! Ignorance for all!
2007-10-29 09:52:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Excellent point!
And I'd turn the familiar "Republicans only care about children before they are born" nonsense on its head. First off, Republicans don't favor using the surgical or chemical methods used in abortions on already-born babies either. And it's hard to take seriously ANY Democratic appeals to help children (or adults!) that these same people didn't care about at all for nine months to begin with. How can Democrats argue with a straight face for the rights of people they didn't even want to make sure were born in the first place?
Every person reading this is a former unborn child.
2007-10-29 09:45:21 · answer #8 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 3⤊ 9⤋
What are you trying to say? I am sorry, maybe it is too early but your question is not making any sense to me.
Pro Life Democrat
2007-10-29 10:08:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
For liberals its all about the children......until the wind changes direction. Don't torture the taliban or al-quaida but rip children from the womb.........yup! For the children! Now I'm worried and will keep a closer eye on my kids. Should I put a sign in my yard that says," Cats and Liberals keep of the Grass" ?
2007-10-29 09:49:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋
If we're going to follow the logic that you just used, do Republicans only like children in the womb? After all they don't see low income children as deservant of health care.
2007-10-29 09:42:09 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋