When Saddam killed many kurdish, the Bush administration saw it as wrong but now when Turkey has to fight them, is there any thing wrong or it is right or wrong when Mr.Bush think so? it is confusing who is right and who is wrong?
2007-10-29 02:09:15 · 8 answers · asked by bionic man 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
NOT AT ALL............
Saddam didn't do anything wrong by containing militant Kurds in his country.....Gas killing was the another hoax like WMD, Chemical & Biological wepons, created by Bush regime to justify Iraq invasion...
For Bush's regime, whatever satisfies US interests, is all right and vice versa........
2007-10-29 02:47:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every race looks at who they are, were they are going, and how to dominate another. In this case, former Saddam Hussein, a minority sunni leader, saw that an independent kurdish rule would have been a problem to the already troubles of Iraq. Turkey sees the same problem evolving around their border. Turkey wants to keep control to land expansion of kurdish people into turkish territory. To suppress it, they must use military action. Our president may object to this decision but turkey may opt to change its position that would not be to our best interest.
2007-10-29 09:42:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam gassed the Kurds whole sale.
He didn't care if they were part of the minority terrorizing Turkey.
The Turkey want to get the Kurdish terrorists.
It won't be so confusing to if you would look at the whole picture instead of the one painted to you by the far left.
It would be like us wanting to wipe out all Muslims just because of 9/11.
I hope you can understand the difference.
2007-10-29 09:26:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So you are comparing fighting between Kurdish militants and Turkey with the genocide of innocents.
Nice analogy...education is a wonderful thing.
2007-10-29 09:21:28 · answer #4 · answered by time_wounds_all_heelz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well in keeping with the laws of law and order, Sadam Hussein did have some ounce of right when he tried to crush the "rebels". The problem is he did it with excessive force and some inhumane methods. Don't forget his actions were made easy by deadly weapons given to him by America. But here is the interesting fact that American's rarely see that shows how rife with double standards our American government is. Bush condemned Sadam Hussein for what he did to the Kurds, even though Sadam did give them an autonymous region but he won't condemn the Turkish government for the mass slaughtering of 1.5 million Armenians in Turkey in what is known as the Armenian Holocaust. When you are a friend of America your evils and human rights records are kept out of radar.
2007-10-29 09:17:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
WHAT THE WESTERN MEDIA MISREPORTD RE SADDAM WAS THE KURDISH TERRORIST WERE WANTING A HUGE PIECE OF iRAQ AND TURKEY AND PARTS OF iRAN AND WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR MANY MANY VIOLENT ATTACKS ON THESE COUNTRIES.These people will,if not curbed,cause chaos in middle east.There is no such place as 'kurdistan',unless you class the united kingdom!!!johnny
2007-10-29 09:33:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The premise of your question is wrong. Saddam gassed and killed many innocent women and children.
2007-10-29 09:12:37 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Genius...When Saddam killed the Kurds.he killed women and children and non combatants...the PPK are rebel insurgents..get the difference?
2007-10-29 09:18:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋