Should i watch this? i thought it sounded pretty good and the type of film i would watch but the reviews i read were very negative. what do u think?
2007-10-29 00:25:58 · 12 answers · asked by The Red Girl 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
The remake, 2005
2007-10-29 00:49:01 · update #1
I thought it was just a huge copy of Cheeper by the Dozen (but not as good)
2007-10-29 03:09:16 · answer #1 · answered by Tigri ♥ Ventola 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The original with Henry Fonda and Lucille Ball is better than the remake with Dennis Quaid. Some movies should just never be remade, at least when there are still people around that are familiar with the original. Another remake gone south is "South Pacific" with Glenn Close. If you saw the original with Mitz Gaynor, the Glenn Close version is horrible. A great movie site to check out movies and is www.imdb.com.
2007-10-29 08:55:52 · answer #2 · answered by Matarc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was really, really bad. I have nothing against family comedies, but thats as effortless and stupid as it gets. Its corny, unfunny and as for the slapstick moments, well, let's just say you'll be the one hitting yourself for watching it. The actors' reactions are totally science fiction. The bonding sequences where the two families realize they love each other is so cheesy, that...how do I describe it? You know how you're watching a predictable/cheesy/clichéd movie and you get that really uncomfortable feeling? Like you're sitting next to a sweatly, fat bald guy? You get the EXACT FEELING! A pooper scooper picked up the worst child actors of our time one day and dumped them into MGM Studios.
2007-10-29 08:02:23 · answer #3 · answered by stormlovingfreak92 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lovely
2007-10-29 08:08:22 · answer #4 · answered by The Rugby Player 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the original? Henry Fonda and Lucille Ball or thr remake with Dennis Quiad and Rene Russo?
both are good!! the original seems better though!
it's like the father of bride with Spencer Tracy or Steve Martin the newer seems more funny! cause of charaters like (Martin Short!)
2007-10-29 07:33:57 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i watched both older and newer version, i don't know if the review were very negative but this movie was quite entertaining. even i guess cheaper by dozen got its inspiration from the older version (starring lucile ball).
If u really want to watch this movie, then go for it! it's likely that you'll never regret anyway..
2007-10-29 08:25:20 · answer #6 · answered by Aimee J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes...
although reviews might be bad... it's just reviews and well it doesn't have scenes that is let us say no good or whatever..
A family film... must watch
2007-10-29 08:12:22 · answer #7 · answered by PcH 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Awful. Just awful. Horrible. I want to smash things.
2007-10-29 08:24:35 · answer #8 · answered by ross x 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I seen the original many years ago and it was good.
2007-10-29 08:52:41 · answer #9 · answered by maryann p 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i loved the original so i thought this was going to be good - i was very disappointed.
2007-10-30 15:05:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋