English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

are you worried? depends on the state. ask a lawyer.

2007-10-28 22:33:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is "aleination of affections." It is a tort action brought by a deserted spouse against a third party alleged to be responsible for the failure of the marriage. The defendant in an alienation of affections suit is typically an adulterous spouse's lover, although family members, counselors, or clergy members who have advised a spouse to seek divorce have also been sued for alienation of affections.

Alienation of affections was first recognized as a tort by the New York state legislature in 1864, and similar legislation existed in many U.S. states in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Since 1935, this tort has been abolished in 43 states. Alienation is, however, still recognized in Hawaii, Illinois, North Carolina, Mississippi, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Utah.

An action for alienation of affection does not require proof of extramarital sex. An alienation claim is difficult to establish because it comprises several elements and there are several defenses. To succeed on an alienation claim, the plaintiff has to show that (1) the marriage entailed love between the spouses in some degree; (2) the spousal love was alienated and destroyed; and (3) defendant’s malicious conduct contributed to or caused the loss of affection. It is not necessary to show that the defendant set out to destroy the marital relationship, but only that he or she intentionally engaged in acts which would foreseeably impact on the marriage. Thus, defendant has a defense against an alienation claim where it can be shown that defendant did not know that the object of his or her affections was in fact married. It is not a defense that the non-innocent spouse consented to defendant’s conduct. But it might be a defense that the defendant was not the active and aggressive seducer. If defendant’s conduct was somehow inadvertent, the plaintiff would be unable to show intentional or malicious action. But prior marital problems do not establish a defense unless such unhappiness had reached a level of negating love between the spouses.

2007-10-29 06:14:23 · answer #2 · answered by Mark 7 · 0 0

I think if you 'sewed' your husband's mistress she might get the needle; if the police cotton onto it and, with your husband as a material witness, you could find yourself being stitched up.
Sorry couldn't resist it. :)

2007-10-29 07:02:39 · answer #3 · answered by Tommy Onions 3 · 1 0

You have to prove that you provided the same services with the same frequency and rate of satisfaction that the mistress supplied.

2007-10-29 05:55:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No offense, but you should look in the mirror - maybe YOU could have done something to keep to marriage working.

2007-11-02 05:12:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ive heard of it. when i was leaving my husband i was seeing another man who had money.. he was worried my husband was gunna sue him for this... theres a name for it.. just cant recall.

2007-10-29 05:35:03 · answer #6 · answered by SGPearlGirl 3 · 0 0

nope, you sew his balls to his a-ss

2007-10-29 08:05:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers