would you do it?
2007-10-28 21:30:22 · 38 answers · asked by Ashley 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
just to let you know i did NOT give anyone a thumbs down, that wasnt me. i gave you all a thumbs up cuz i respect your answers!
:)
2007-10-28 21:34:31 · update #1
Yes but not absolutely naked maybe with underwears or something sexy i don't wanna look like whore
2007-10-28 21:47:56 · answer #1 · answered by jessyyyy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Personally, while being fully aware of what the symbolism is, I've always liked the original bunny logo, and have a few items myself. But that is my personal choice. I think that the Playboy brand, by reinventing itself as pink and fluffy - cushions, little purses etc - has tapped into a whole new market, and as such has made a brilliant financial move, and has become a brand that everyone wants to wear, like Chanel, Guess and D&G. However, that doesn't mean I agree with the main focus of this commercialism being aimed at young girls. On the other hand, just because adults know the origins of the bunny, does that mean it's wrong for children to wear it? (Playing Devil's advocate, here!) To them, it's an innocent design, which everyone else is wearing - like the adidas brand. In my opinion, I have more objections to the Bratz dolls than to the bunny. The dolls are encouraging young girls to dress and act more provocatively - even more so since the Bratz Kids came on the scene. At least there don't seem to be Playboy dolls for children - yet!
2016-05-25 23:50:55 · answer #2 · answered by aline 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ABSOLUTELY!
I have LOTS of respect for myself regardless of what other people would say. If you've ever looked at a Playboy magazine you'll see that it is NOT porn. The girls are not fingering themselves or playing with dildos, they're "lounging" haha. It's sexual CONNOTATION that's all, barely even that if you ask me. 10 years from now Playboy will be like a children's book the way our society is going... lol ok maybe not that acceptable but pretty close.
I actually WANT to be a Playmate.
2007-10-31 04:28:40 · answer #3 · answered by Just.l.o.v.e.Me 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To all of the girls out there, I would let you know that Playboy is probably the most respectable men's magazine to feature nude women. It is more about beauty and art than it really is about sex. If you ever read one you would know that. Everything else out there is smut.
2007-10-28 21:36:58 · answer #4 · answered by Patrick E 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Really it depends on how much they pay me.
My partner would never let me, but I would do playboy (and more) as long as I got a good rate of pay. I have no qualms about selling images of my body for money, It's like getting something for nothing, i mean, people can look at me when I walk down the street, it would be the same as them PAYING me too look at me.
2007-10-28 21:33:27 · answer #5 · answered by myleslr 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I would do it .....but Hugh Hefner would have to add an extra page to the centerfold since I am 54 and things are not in the right place anymore!!
2007-10-28 21:50:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think Playboy would pay me to keep my clothes on
2007-10-28 21:42:35 · answer #7 · answered by sharkgirl 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would, I have a playboy bunny tattoo with a halo and it says: " Angel, 'till I'm naked "
2007-10-28 21:45:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. l have nothing to show. Even if l beg them to get me, they'll never say yes. Ouch!
lol
2007-10-28 21:41:09 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
nooo
having in mind what men do with these magazines..........
it's so disgusting,no sum is able to convcince me to such a think,because I have respect for myself !!!
2007-10-28 21:52:15 · answer #10 · answered by sunny_babe_ 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋