Don't You think Mick Is Kinda Pathetic For A Vampire?
He only wins by luck
2007-10-28 17:28:38 · 5 answers · asked by mizu 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television ➔ Drama
I like it..We should remember Mick is still "Young"..not as old as the Vampires that we are used to watching.,
2007-10-28 19:44:08 · answer #1 · answered by Sheri2271 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with all the others. Mick is ' still primarily human". He is a newbie compared to other vamps we have watched in the past and present
Forever Knight- Nick Knight was 800 years old
Blood Ties- Henry Fitzroy 480 years old
Angel- He was over 200 years old
Mick is still " wet behind the ears compared to them- only being 85 years old.
Mick's "mentor" (since he offed his sire- his wife) Joseph is 450 years old
I like the series and hope it sticks around
2007-10-29 11:02:04 · answer #2 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he's pathetic. But as far as portrayals of vampires go... I think they made him a bit too "human". I think "Forever Knight" and "Buffy" and "Angel" actually struck a good balance as far as vampires on tv go. But I'll still watch "Moonlight". I'll watch anything featuring vampires.
2007-10-28 17:35:06 · answer #3 · answered by ✿Donna❀ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no i think he's pretty good...maybe not the best but i still like him and will watch the show!
2007-10-28 18:07:59 · answer #4 · answered by racergoil89 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
watch it now..will not be around long...............he is too touchy feely
2007-10-28 17:41:58 · answer #5 · answered by richard t 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋