September 11, 2001, the truth???

Question

i was wondering WTC 1 & 2 Were destroyed bc of the planes hitting them. But what about WTC # 7, there was a fire that lasted for about 3 hours and the govt. says that they building was destroyed bc of it, when there have been fires that for 12 hours and those buildings are still standing. still don't believe me ??? 7 out 19 hijackers who "supposedly" were part in what happened that day are still alive, and they have been working for the FBI.
Ever heard of the "Pancake Theory"??? those building were built to stand those planes hitting them. even if those planes did hit them the titanium bars that held up would still be standing just everything else to the floor. the only way those would have collapsed would have been through demolition, which through several videos you can see Demolition parts planted across the building.

Do you think this was a plan by our Govt or by Osama bin laden?

There is more and you can see it at this website
http://zeitgeistmovie.com/

Answer 1

it was just a result of the impact from such enormous buildings crashing down in lightning speed, ridiculous stuff will happen, its all unprecedented so who is anyone to say what should or shouldnt be happening, it was a tragic horrible day and rather try to blame it on the govt we need to make sure it doesnt happen again so be suspicious of the govt if you want but leave 9/11 where it is

Answer 2

Most sites/youtube videos don't say anything about the south side of WTC 7 (the side facing the wtc1&2.) There was extensive damage on that side. Before the building collapsed, firemen were reporting a bulge on the southwest side of the building - a reason why they were telling people that the building was going to collapse.

Surviving the impact of a plane doesn't mean it won't collapse later. It just means when the plane hits, the building isn't going to suddenly collapse. The WTC had a different design than most buildings too. Its supports were on the outside of the building, so there would be more space inside. It would be like a soda can, with paper as the floors.

If the building was collapsed through demolition, we would have known. You just don't stick bombs in the building to bring it down. A lot of the supports have to be cut first.

Answer 3

I think it was a plan by Osama bin Laden, but I also think that the government was well aware of it and just turned their heads the other direction.

I have heard a lot of these conspiracy theories, but they are so widely debated that I got lost in all the information. I have read the 9/11 Commission Report, and it is a joke. There are definitely some unsolved mysteries and coverups regarding 9/11, but I doubt we will ever find out the truth.

I have seen Zeitgeist... Good movie, especially the Federal Reserve portion (Part 3)!! I think Part 2 about 9/11 is a little misleading though. Part 1 is interesting, but I haven't had time to research everything.

The website below debunks some of the conspiracy theories.

Answer 4

Enough of the conspiracy crap! It has been refuted so many times before.
Have you never taken the time to watch the tv shows about building demolition? Have you no idea how many months it would have taken to wire even one tower for demolition? How come nobody noticed the hundreds of demolition workers coming and going? How come nobody noticed the hundreds of miles of detonation cables strung about the building. How come nobody noticed the thousands of holes in the columns that would have been drilled to accomodate the shaped charges? How come nobody noticed the truckloads of materials that would have been necessary to set it up? How come nobody noticed the air drills, compressors, and other equipment used by the demo experts? How come nobody noticed the several hundred leads from the demo shack to the towers necessary for the timed explosions to be computer controlled in order, one after the other?

And for those that think a plane didn't hit the Pentagon I suggest a good look at the rubble in front of the building, and explain how luggage from a non-existent plane got there.

Answer 5

Planes where smaller back when the building was designed in the 60's. The planes that hit the towers where much larger and carried more fuel. Sorry to say those where not titanium beams in that building. They where steel. And the steel beams will melt under extreme heat. Tall buildings will pancake out when they collapse.

Answer 6

the zeitgeist movie makes so interesting points. like demolision experts saying the buildings should not fall that fast and comparing it to the luthsitania (sp?), the ship the US gov't sailed into German waters knowing it would be sunk by the germans. that the government wanted a way into WWI. that George bush needed a great enemy to get support for military spending and terroists would make the best enemy ever one thats impossible to defeat

It was also convient that on sept 11, 2001 Dick Cheney was in control of the NORAD system and he had the miltary planes that would have been used to protect the East coast from terrorist attack on training missions faraway from their home bases.

personally i dont think in one hand you can say the us gov't is inept and then the next breath say they pull off a cover-up of this magnitude.

I agree with the pretty lady below that part 1 and 3 of zeitguiest were much better. the religon and banking more likely accurate parts the 9/11 part was a little too much conspiracy theory

Answer 7

9-11 became certainly, one hundred% an interior activity. I quite have reveiwed lots of the information and function researched for years. there's no question in my ideas in any respect apart from one. What did they do with the passangers? No airplane hit the pentagon. the place are the passangers? vice chairman admits to capturing down ninety 3, the planes that hit the towers have been drones crammed with the our bodies of the unique passangers, however the airplane that supposedly hit the pentagon under no circumstances hit the construction. So in case you inquire from me i've got self assurance one % this became an interior activity and the government is the single to blame, yet the place are the passengers?

Answer 8

Titanium is very expensive and I doubt that they used that. When this happened, the architect was interviewed and said that these towers were designed to withstand the force of the largest plane in production at the time, and I think that was a 707 or 727. These were larger planes and full of fuel.

Answer 9

OK let me tell you about all I can about this question.
#1. The government was NOT INVOLVED, except that our airline securities sucked back then.
#2. It is written in the Koran that they will upset a "Great Eagle" hmmmmm America's bird. And it finishes by saying "he will chase after us and destroy us", what are we doing in the Middle East right now?
#3. Well gee there is no evidence of a plane hitting the pentagon like wing marks or such. WELL DUH! WHAT WAS THE PENTAGON DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND, A MISSLE, WHAT WHAT ID DESIGNED NOT TO WITHSTAND, A ******* PLANE, WHY NOT, BECAUSE WHO FLYS PLANES INTO BUILDING, NO ONE IS THAT CRAZY. Oops we were wrong about that one! Yikes, next phase lets make that Son of a ***** stronger! And no wing marks! ha proof! NOOOOO sorry, the reason there were no wingmarks is because the wings aren't nearly strong enough to slam into a concrete wall.

Answer 10

The only TRUTH about the 9/11 attacks is that people who take this conspiracy theory "loose change" BS seriously are even stupider than you make George W. Bush out to be.