it seems destined to be divided, why not consider separation instead of blaming the other side for their failures.
2007-10-28 14:40:58 · 25 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It isn't??
http://www.tagworld.com/buckfush/PictureDetail.aspx?id=eb0519a4-b9c4-41d3-b167-97a7e2811921
But anyway I am all in favour.
The Rep States would go bankcrupt with
all their tax dodgers and unable to afford war.
2007-10-28 14:48:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 7⤋
the justifications are historic, yet, the two peoples are diverse. Subtly, yet, diverse. the united states of a became settled oftentimes by ability of individuals searching for religious freedom. The early immigrants have been oftentimes ardent Protestant Reforms, Calvinists, Puritans, and others, who left Europe to stay their resourceful and prescient of Christianity. meanwhile, Canada became settled first by ability of the French - Roman Catholic, then by ability of individuals from the united kingdom, who have been Anglicans. Their questioning became very on the brink of the Catholics. So, you have a reliable Reform Protestant human beings interior the united states of a, and extra Catholic, or Catholic leaning in Canada. Granted, this became a protracted time in the past, yet, those impacts are nevertheless felt right this moment. the united states of a is lots extra to the main appropriate politically than Canada. the united states of a additionally has a historic previous of rebelling against authority, and to this present day, the police at the instant are not properly respected, nor are rules. Canada has consistently remained unswerving, and appreciate for regulation and order are greater. Canada additionally has a lots greater tolerance of alternative peoples, and races. So, Canadians see the united states of a as crammed with crime, and people who step on others to get forward. We see ourselves as extra tolerant, peace loving, and keen to help others, and pay the expenses for that. So, Canadians see few, if any reward to being component to the yankee gadget. we adore our united states because it quite is, and prefer to maintain the worst of yank subculture out.
2016-10-02 23:32:49 · answer #2 · answered by carolan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The whole red state/blue state thing is deceiving. In national elections, most states are carried by as little as one or two percentage points. Every city and state is divided politically. We generally get along pretty well anyway, despite the overheated rhetoric of election years.
2007-10-28 14:47:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Yes but this time the South will win, they learned a big lesson and will a 40 million strong illegal army reserve it would not take that much, pull the other states, it would be a shoe in. Everybody else could go to Seattle. Although once split the nations might susceptible to being invaded like by you know aliens or terrorist, but would solve a problem, one side would take the illegals and hiltabeast. Wait I don't know, but if Southern quits fumbling they might score and beat CFA.
Now that I think about it,no, but USM is on the ten. Take care.
2007-10-28 14:59:18 · answer #4 · answered by R J 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
We really do not need to separate however that would be fine. There is enough variety in the world that surely everyone can find what they are looking for. Would a one-way ticket to any country on the planet that more relates to your political leaning suffice? If you like Communism and nationalized healthcare then you get a one-way ticket to Cuba etc.
2007-10-28 15:16:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
The tug-of-war in this country is what made it great. Funny, no matter how hard conservatives try, times always change.
2007-10-28 14:58:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Personally I think political debate is healthy and necessary, but if you like living in a one party society you can try this idea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesusland
2007-10-28 14:49:00 · answer #7 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hell yeah, the conservatives join the Confederate States of America and the liberals stay in the United States.... Have fun with that psycho Hillary as a president!
2007-10-28 14:55:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋
Then red states like Alabama, Mississippi, Kentucky, and Tennessee wouldn't be able to get welfare from productive blue states like California, New York, Massachusetts, and Washington.
2007-10-28 14:52:31 · answer #9 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 7⤊ 4⤋
No, bad idea. America has always bickered back and forth on the issues, nothing new.
2007-10-28 14:57:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I agree with cutting out the blue states.....I`m willing to move if that ever became the case. America seems to be poisoned by the water, according to the electoral maps. The blue state leaders are the ones destroying America from within.
2007-10-28 14:48:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋