I seriously doubt Jesus would support the Republican party and the neocon war agenda.
Does Jesus really support tax cuts for the rich, high debts, and endless wars?
2007-10-28 13:49:30 · 28 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Jesus Christ is NOT a Republican.
Jesus Christ is NOT a Democrat.
Jesus Christ IS a Libertarain- and I can prove it.
Jesus Christ was a firm believer in self determination and self will- hence HIS ideas of "Free Will" and the right of people to chose.
Libertarians belive this wholeheartedly; hence Jesus Christ would probably be a Libertariain, today
2007-10-28 14:10:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Jesus was not a political type. In fact, he avoided the issues of taxation other than to suggest that we should render unto Ceasar what is Ceasars.
It is wrong to even suggest that Jesus would be in favor of tax cuts for the rich (this has never happen, but Democrats claim any tax cut is for the right, but they think rich is over $30,000 per year), high debts or endless war. Fortunately, real Republicans (Neo-Cons are really Democrats who have taken over the Republican party.) don't support these either.
Jesus was not political and the things you suggest Republicans support are lies. The truth is Jesus would suggest you stop lying about those you disagree with and instead pray for them. I will pray for you.
2007-10-28 17:16:09 · answer #2 · answered by A Human Bean 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've not heard this, however the Republican party has attempted to pass themselves off as the virtuous party which is getting harder to do all the time with all the real life contradictions to this notion. I know some Republicans who are party members because they believe abortion and homosexuality is wrong and offensive to God. I think they may forget that lying, stealing, etc. are just as offensive to God and we know at the Federal level there is plenty of that going on as well. I guess when Jesus said, "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone"', He was saying none of us can claim to be any more righteous than anybody else.
2007-10-28 14:06:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Gee, I was going to say stupidity and self-righteousness until you became self-righteous in your question. I am certainly not rich, but I've benefited from the tax cuts of the past few years. I don't know of anyone who is for "endless war" but the only "endless war" that springs to mind is the Vietnam War that was started by a Democrat and escalated by a Democrat. It was a Republican who ended it. So your assertion doesn't make any sense. It was also a Democrat who far exceeded the national budget for the first time in our history in an attempt to get us out of the Great Depression. That didn't work, but he started a trend.
2007-10-28 13:58:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
So early interior the morning to have this form of watered down pointless question yet here it is going. Republicans do supply to charity. Christians supply to charity. Nowhere interior the Bible does it say that we are to place "charity" interior the arms of the government. It does not say that we've got no accountability different than to pay taxes and allow somebody else shelter the unwell, widowed and aged. The Bible is likewise obvious that in case you're no longer keen to paintings and make investments, you have no declare to something. The Bible is crammed with conflict thoughts. attempt analyzing one. The lie you're bearing on isn't a lie. It became no longer a lie while the two Clintons, Kerry, and others suggested it interior the ninety's. it remains no longer a lie. We did discover saran gasoline and yellow cake. The mass graves have been dissimilar. the guy bragged approximately having WMDs. in case your neighbor bragged approximately having an arsenal of weapons and suggested he became going to apply them against you, you will possibly choose him to be stopped. i might quite like so you might tell me what number situations ought to Saddam been allowed to interrupt the words of his end fireplace settlement. what number UN resolutions did he ought to defy. He became 18 as quickly as we desperate to take him heavily. Now, bypass get your pop tart and activate MTV
2016-10-14 07:16:45 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus would kick the neocons a$$es
"go Jesus"
2007-10-28 14:21:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No conservative has ever claimed Jesus would be a republican. However they do believe that He would not support many of the Liberal policies of the democratic party of today. Abortion primarily comes to mind.
Conservatives tend to be more religious in general and cleave unto their beliefs while not shying away from seeing the world in black and whites as opposed to liberals who are more pragmatic and tend to see the shades of grey. I'm not saying this is fair, but in many instances today it tends to be true.
2007-10-28 13:57:16 · answer #7 · answered by Joanne G 2 · 7⤊ 1⤋
I do not know of any republican who has made such a claim. If you really have...please share.
Jesus wasn't into politics so I doubt he was either democrat or republican and I seriously doubt he would approve of either.
Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s
2007-10-28 13:58:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Jesus represents no party, because religion has no business in politics. If indeed he does represent a party it is the independents.
2007-10-28 14:27:18 · answer #9 · answered by Michael M 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I haven't seen that but only a fool would claim to speak for Jesus.
2007-10-28 14:00:10 · answer #10 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋