I hope so, it would be nice to have the constitution mean something again.
2007-10-28 13:12:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by nytebreid 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Libs have self assurance that shot she places out approximately taxing the wealthy to offer the unfavorable loose wellbeing care (extra tax and spend). it can't be completed. the wealthy very own the industries that produce each little thing the unfavorable use- nutrition, outfits, automobiles, homes, etc. If we boost taxes on the wealthy, they gained't settle for it. they are going to boost expenses on the products the unfavorable desire, consequently passing the tax by way of. IOW, Hillary needs to make wellbeing care a tax supported welfare application. there's a classic tax supported welfare application already in place- social secure practices. See how that works, and sweetness, can we desire wellbeing care to be like social secure practices? Or seem on the state welfare. Or seem at Canada's socialized drugs. After sixty 5, you get NO medical, no longer regardless of in case you PAY for it. And, if a Canadian desires some severe medical care, like maximum cancers medical care, the bureaucratic pink tape delays the approach, till, generally a affected person dies earlier the medical care is authorized. it quite is why Canadians come to the U. S. to get medical interest. we are able to no longer have sufficient funds socialized drugs, yet while Hillary receives in, we can get it- assured! ______________________________________... KrazyKyngeKorny(Krazy, no longer stupid) ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯...?
2016-10-02 23:27:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by owen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
America likes to celebrate firsts....the first woman on the moon, the first African-American to circle around the earth in a balloon, the first Asian American to get a gold medal in curling, the first Native American to win eating the most hot dogs in 1 minute, the first openly gay person to serve as Joint Chiefs of Staff......etc.....
If she wins, great, we won't have to say the first woman president ever again.....unless after that there's the second woman president.....
2007-10-28 13:23:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by boxjellÿ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
If she wins, yes. And no.
After WWI, President Wilson had a stroke and finished his term so completely disabled that, according to one columnist he was 'just another pillow on the bed'. His administration was run by his wife, Edith, a woman who had never finished high school!
Also for a while there during Reagan's second term, I think Nancy was pretty much in charge of things. Many important national policy decisions were made by her astrologer!
2007-10-28 13:05:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. Too many people, those who know her and those who do not, simply will not vote for her. She will however 1) lose the White House for her party ot 2) be the king maker in nominating an electable candidate.
2007-10-28 13:11:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by ildonkle 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. But...She WILL be the First Bull Dyke President.
Little Sissy Johnny Edwards "could" have been the First Woman President. But he got caught being a Hypocrite.
Osama Obama "could" have been the First Muslim President. But Hillary stomped him.
IT'S OVER!!!!!!!
The Bull Dyke Wins.
GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-10-28 13:02:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by wolf 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
She better than the ones who running now , She got my vote !!
2015-10-20 05:31:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Delores 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2007-10-28 13:07:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Girl 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Given the other candidates to choose from......... I sure hope so!!!!!
2007-10-28 14:10:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I really hope not, or may God have mercy on us all.
2007-10-28 13:00:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋