English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-28 12:48:23 · 6 answers · asked by michr 7 in Politics & Government Politics

if we are to believe that iraq is the center of our war on terror and it is in our national interest to be there and or shoilders have died in vain if we leave without completeing the mission then how can we believe we would leave if asked. perhaps all those other statements are less then truth?

2007-10-28 13:20:48 · update #1

if we are to believe that iraq is the center of our war on terror and it is in our national interest to be there and or soilders have died in vain if we leave without completeing the mission then how can we believe we would leave if asked. perhaps all those other statements are less then truth?

2007-10-28 13:21:19 · update #2

6 answers

Yes, we would begin leaving by their directive. That would be an easy out for everyone in Washington.

2007-10-28 12:51:24 · answer #1 · answered by rance42 5 · 0 0

Yes. It would give President Bush an out.

2007-10-28 19:55:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yup, that has always been on the table. It would be difficult removing equipment, forces and so forth. It would be extremely dangerous for our brave soldier's. Best is to never reveal the strategy.

2007-10-28 19:58:13 · answer #3 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0 1

Yes,

2007-10-28 19:56:34 · answer #4 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 0 2

No! But we'd immediately send some of the guys on their third or fourth "tour" to Iran!

2007-10-28 19:58:45 · answer #5 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 1 1

Now that's funny.

2007-10-28 19:52:39 · answer #6 · answered by wooper 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers