English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So Putin and Bush have pretty much laid out their directives, with Putin saying that an American attack on Iran would be considered an attack on Russia, and Bush responding that any attempt to secure Iran would result in another world war.

A considerable amount of americans think that this iraq war and occupation should not have happened.
Though most americans think that we can't quite simply pull out all our effort there, many have "washed their hands clean" from any association of this war. This is a very unpopular war.
If Russia really will take the Iran situation as seriously as they imply, then you better bet you ever-loving *** that China is going to want in on it. It would be too good of an opportunity for either country to destroy America's hegemonial powers.

2007-10-28 10:54:01 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

If world war breaks out, Americans won't think that a world war is worth dealing with a smaller power like Iran. I mean, really. The second Iran sent a nuclear weapon on an American city (or any other city, allied with us or not), America would return it with nuclear devastation many times over, anyways.

The point I am making here is that a World war would require an enormous drafting of American citizens unlike any other war before it. Americans don’t believe in this hypothetical war enough to respond to that draft. Americans will not go to war, they will largely ignore the draft to the point that America will not have forces to fight that war. Thanks George Bush, you are a genius.

2007-10-28 10:54:12 · update #1

3 answers

good question.

2007-10-28 11:05:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Wars seldom have winners but Iran would certainly be a loser if it ever fought the U.S. Conventional weapons would quickly turn Iran into an uninhabitable wasteland.
It would not require winning the hearts and minds of anyone, it would be a brutal bloodbath. Stealth bombers would drop very large bombs with very little concern about collateral damage. The survivors would be worse off than the people of Hiroshima.

2007-10-28 18:24:20 · answer #2 · answered by Menehune 7 · 0 0

IF GLOBAL NUCLEAR WAR BREAKS OUT,IT WILL HAPPEN SO FAST WHO CARES ABOUT POPULAR SUPPORT. IT WILL BE ABOUT BASIC SURVIVAL AFTER THE HOLOCAUST.WORLD SUPPORT OR CRITICISM WILL MEAN NOTHING , THE WORLD AS WE KNEW IT WILL NOT EXIST, A VAST WASTE LAND WILL ALL THAT WILL BE LEFT.LESS THAN 10 OR 15% OF THE PEOPLE WILL BE LEFT ALIVE ON THE ENTIRE WORLD. THE DUST KICKED UP WILL BLOT OUT THE SUN, CREATING A NUCLEAR WINTER .THE EARTH WILL FREEZE,ALL PLANT LIFE WILL DIE OFF,AND ALL WATER SUPPLIES WILL BE CONTAMINATED WITH FALLOUT.IF YOUR LUCKY YOU WILL HAVE DIED IN THE FIRST WAVE OF DESTRUCTION.

2007-10-28 20:22:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers