English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Wouldn't you like Hilary Clinton to choose Barrack Obama as her running mate if she wins the nomination?

I have heard arguments against Hilary choosing Obama. They say she'll need to choose a Southerner, or a white man, or someone totally uncontraversial. I've also heard they just don't like each other.

But I still think they would make a great pair that would energize the voters.

2007-10-28 10:38:26 · 22 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1 in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

To answer your question with a little bit of competence...I think it would energize the party and he would deflect some of her negatives...

But from a simple electoral standpoint I think she would choose a white man from a state that she needs like Indiana or New Mexico. She already has Illinois and the black vote so she really doesn't need him. I think she would have to calculate how much of the black vote she would lose by not choosing him vs what she would gain by chhosing someone else.

By the way...He wouldnt need her either if the situation becomes reversed.

I see both of them looking seriously at Evan Bayh of Indiana.

2007-10-28 11:03:18 · answer #1 · answered by Triumph 4 · 1 0

I thought at first they would but they don't seem to really like each other. I think it will be Hillary and Bill Richardson , Gen Wesley Clark will be her Sec. of Defense Joe Biden Sec.of the State and she will choose some of Bill Clinton's former staff members. But she will be our next President Of The United States, you bet.

2007-10-28 10:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by Nicki 6 · 2 1

Yeah, a wonderful pairing it would be.

Kinda like a blending of Hitler, Mussolini, Gehngis Khan, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, with a dash Gamel Adul Nasser, and Idi Amin.

If you really believe that this is a good team, then you definitely need a new tin foil hat.

This would only energize me to head for the can to puke.

Next Dumb question, please.

2007-10-28 10:57:30 · answer #3 · answered by largecar8 4 · 0 2

I agree....it would be exciting and progressive. I don't think we'll see it though. I'm sure I don't need to tell you to ignore all of the psychotic neo-cons getting loose on you right now....it's funny watching them still on the Titanic...err...Bush nutz...despite being the worst president EVER....man, Rush Limbaugh must be handing out supplies from his med stash for all this delusion to still be running wild. LOL...crazy a.ss jesus freaks and war lovers....SOLID.

2007-10-28 11:09:40 · answer #4 · answered by DoctorMontalban 2 · 2 0

Energize? Yeah, right to the polls to vote for the right cadndidate, and that's not Hillary or Obama!

2007-10-28 10:57:25 · answer #5 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 1 3

No. I would be disgusted to know that Barack Obama would sell his soul for the Vice Presidency.

2007-10-28 10:43:38 · answer #6 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 6 2

No Hillary has already choosen Edwards. You see if they actually win then it sets pretty boy up to run in 2016.

2007-10-28 10:42:15 · answer #7 · answered by coco d 4 · 0 2

Yeah, "energize voters" would be the phrase. Looks beatable. Go for it.

2007-10-28 10:48:42 · answer #8 · answered by crunch 6 · 2 2

No, but Paul and Obama would!

But who wants those filthy Constitution supporters in office anyway huh?

2007-10-28 10:49:33 · answer #9 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 0 3

Yes, they'd energize the voters, alright! To vote for the opposition!

2007-10-28 10:41:36 · answer #10 · answered by amazin'g 7 · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers