English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm sure as hell not

2007-10-28 10:11:23 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

26 answers

A better question is why would anybody.

2007-10-28 10:17:02 · answer #1 · answered by wichitaor1 7 · 5 8

Ron Paul is the only candidate running to preserve the rights and liberties for all Americans. We need to understand that we are in control of our own lives and do not need a government to tell us how to operate on a daily basis.

The only freedom loving, non-special interest, and honest man in the entire arena of politics, Ron Paul.

Dr. Paul, also has the best record in GOP straw polls. And, he will also have my vote in the primary.

2007-10-28 17:16:24 · answer #2 · answered by Xenu 2 · 1 2

i admire Ron Paul, too. yet do you truthfully have self assurance he's gonna end all of this? The corruption is only too damn deep, what's he gonna do? sit down in the place of work and rant approximately chickening out the troops from the middle East? No dude, you sit down the f*ck down and do what your advised. It would not exist, corruption won't in any respect flow away, and he won't end it.

2016-12-30 08:52:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Ron Paul Must Win!!
Rudy is a Fascist Seeking World Domination.

I know this sounds a bit like a conspiracy theory, but check it out for yourself.

Project For A New American Century.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/

The above link is for the "Think Tank" that influenced Bush's doctrine, and will influence every candidate's doctrine in '08 EXCEPT Dr. Ron Paul's.

And they aren't even afraid to admit what their goal is!

If you think like a German of the early 1900s with an American twist, where the ideals of our country are perfect and must be spread around the world through force. Then go ahead and vote for anybody but Paul.

But if you believe in national sovereignty, freedom, and the right of individuals to lead their own lives, then vote for the ONLY candidate that will not succumb to the FASCIST policies polluting our great country.

http://www.ronpaul2008.com

2007-10-28 11:15:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6 6

I am.

So far he is the only Republican, or Constitutionalist running for president. The rest have problems with the Constitution, and refuse to address it.

The Constitution is the reason why everyone who talks sh*t about Ron Paul can only call him names, and cannot point out how he is Constitutionally wrong.

You people are voting for the wrong reasons, and you need to read the Presidential Oath before you select your next Socialist, or Neocon.

2007-10-28 11:16:45 · answer #5 · answered by vote_usa_first 7 · 6 4

I am voting for Ron Paul.

2007-10-28 11:21:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6 4

Anybody tired of the direction of this country is.
Anyone sick of the irresponsible spending of the government is.
Anyone that supports the constitution is.
Anybody oppossed to this illegal war is.
Anybody that doesnt want to attack Iran is.
Anyone that has doen research on Ron Pauls record is.
Anyone believing in freedom and liberty is.
Anyone with a brain is.
Ron Paul for President our only hope. the only one with integrity,experience and honesty that does what he says.
This is the most important election for our freedom dont piss it away vote support and donate for Ron Paul.

2007-10-28 13:10:27 · answer #7 · answered by stephenmwells 5 · 4 5

I am. So are a lot more people. I can't wait for the NH primary. The look on neo-con faces will be priceless.

Why make a question about what you aren't doing? Sounds like asker is scared lol.

2007-10-28 15:10:53 · answer #8 · answered by crucial_master 3 · 3 3

I don't attribute the 9/11 conspiracy theorists to him, as he doesn't believe that. He also speaks on some principles about libertarianism that are correct. However, I don't think he'd be a particularly good executor to those policies. He also has irresponsible ideas on foreign policy. Apparently the message of liberty is strong domestically but has no capacity of influence in other countries. Not that there aren't better ways to handle the Middle East situation than what they're doing now, and not that Ron Paul isn't correct on some points about blow back, but you can't be in the 1920s either.

2007-10-28 10:20:54 · answer #9 · answered by thalog482 4 · 1 8

I am he is the only one who actually wants to do things they way they are ment to. By the constitution.

2007-10-29 01:59:29 · answer #10 · answered by SS4 Elby 5 · 0 2

I would definitely vote for him. It would be nice to have an intelligent president with values for a change. The fact that Hillary has 48% of Democrat's support is unbelievable to me. If another bag of douche is elected president I'll move to Mexico.

2007-10-28 10:51:02 · answer #11 · answered by Joseph B 1 · 5 6

fedest.com, questions and answers