English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." 6-29-04

"It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...and replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity." 5-29-07

"(We)...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people." 6-4-07

"We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own...in order to create this common ground." 6-4-07

"I certainly think the free-market has failed." 6-4-07

"I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched." 9-2-05

2007-10-28 09:22:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

8 answers

No, she isn't. As a matter of fact, her biggest problem is being pro-war and pro-corporation. She takes tons(like the Republicans) from corporations.

2007-10-28 09:28:56 · answer #1 · answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6 · 1 2

Your quotes are very interesting, she was, for instance speaking of the obscene profits big oil is making, on the backs of little old ladies who will freeze to death this winter due to the cost of heating oil.
Your second quote sounds pretty good to me, I don't like paying more taxes so the rich few can get a tax break.
Your next few are in the same area.
I also think the free market as pushed by the Republicans has failed, and miserably at that. Removing all responsibility has led to poor banking practices that encourage them to write marginal mortgages with the resulting loss of wealth to middle class people, even the ones who have standard mortgages and have not defaulted, their homes have gone down in value due to excess building. And insurance and airlines are too expensive and only want to take money and not give service in kind.
Yes, I do think that given the response of untrammeled greed they have not shown themselves to have anything else in view. They need regulation, or we will be shoveling money at them for no reason at all.
Is it really your view that Free Markets should be Fleece Markets for the unwary and unsophisticated? Because business has proven itself to be unworthy of trust.
Thats not Marxism, thats just good sense.

2007-10-28 10:05:52 · answer #2 · answered by justa 7 · 1 1

I certainly hope we get it! I think she is much worse than you say. I certainly hope she is defeated soon, or that she is no longer able to bribe people from releasing dirt about her so that we know the truth about her before it is too late.

2007-10-28 09:29:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

i became questioning extra alongside the traces that she listened to the comparable consultant's Bush had yet be conscious of has the intelligence to declare it became incorrect instead of stumbling forward like a moron.

2016-10-14 06:51:43 · answer #4 · answered by kosmoski 4 · 0 0

i look at actions more than words. when you consider the actions of a knowing willing participant in the last presidential clinton mess like hillary its obvious what type of individual the liberals are trying to elect

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

2007-10-28 09:42:52 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 2

Oh, I get it alright! She is dangerous for America.

2007-10-28 09:25:39 · answer #6 · answered by amazin'g 7 · 0 1

maybe that is what we need, the russians are doing pretty good these days.

2007-10-28 10:09:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

she is evil and we should do everything possible so she doesn't get elected president.

2007-10-28 09:30:12 · answer #8 · answered by ♥STREAKER♥©℗† 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers