English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After all the lying he did about Iraq's threat potential?
Fool me twice.....

2007-10-28 08:30:16 · 12 answers · asked by Popeye 1 in News & Events Current Events

12 answers

Well, he expected us to believe Iraq was a threat.
He staged a 'terrorist attack', then lied to Congress, hoodwinked the American people, and conned our courageous U.S. troops into believing there was honorable purpose in attacking another sovereign nation that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the United States.

It's obvious: Bush picks his battles based on availability of cheap, easily-accessible OIL. The Bush family had a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein ever since the days of Desert Storm when George H.W. Bush was criticized, ridiculed and humiliated for 'not finishing the job' and ousting Hussein at that time;
Cheney coveted all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands;
and the giant U.S. military-industrial complex [which Eisenhower warned us about] needed a new 'war' to boost sagging profits from so many years of peace.

So, 675,000 Iraqis and 3,900 U.S. soldiers have given their lives so that a handful of wealthy elitists, industrialists and power brokers can become wealthier and more powerful.

The Bilderberg Conference selected Bush as President so that he could 'settle the score' with Hussein; so that Dick Cheney could line the pockets of all his OIL buddies; and so that independent contractors could belly up to the government money trough, including those two newest contractors: the Carlyle Group and Halliburton, BOTH of whom have direct ties to the Bush-Cheney White, and BOTH of whom have made BILLIONS in excessive profits from this unjustified, unconstitutional, illegal, immoral 'war' in Iraq.

Bushites know "weapons of mass destruction" won't work again, but they're confident they can concoct a rational reason for invading Iran that most gullible Americans will 'buy'. As soon as they can orchestrate their plan, Bush WILL attack Iran. No doubt about it.

This time it will probably require an even more horrific 'terrorist attack' - this time somewhere in the Midwest (probably Chicago or St. Louis). This time more than 5,000 people will die. And this time Bush will have substantial physical 'proof' that Iran was, indeed, the perpetrator of the attack.

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and all their war-monger, money grubbing friends deserve a special OIL-soaked, blood-stained corner of Hell where they can rot eternally, along with:
535 members of the most arrogant, incompetent, slothful, contemptible, cowardly, corrupt Republican-led Congress in U.S. history that stood by and watched Bush run rip shod over our Constitution
-AND-
535 members of the most arrogant, incompetent, slothful, contemptible, cowardly corrupt Democratic-led Congress in U.S. history that promised to end this 'war' if elected, and - to date - have done absolutely nothing to keep that promise. May God DAMN them all!!! -RKO- 10/28/07

2007-10-28 08:47:35 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 1 2

Iran may be a threat but Bush worries me too.
This man has lied through his teeth since he came to power with a campaign financed by the big energy and construction corporations.
He is the person more likely to spring the World into a nuclear holocaust.
He and his cohorts have also impinged dramatically on the democratic freedoms on which the american constitution was based.

2007-10-28 09:04:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

communicate approximately paranoid... at the start: the CIA isn't inflicting the present issues in Gaza etc. The violence is simply by fact Hamas and Fatah the two desire administration and right this moment, began 'revenge' assaults on one yet another's supporters. it quite is have been given no longer something to do with Israel. The Palestinians held their very own elections, something Israel did no longer even try to stop even nevertheless the Israelis knew finished properly that the Palestinians may be able to choose the extra severe of the two communities; a team which refuses to properly known Israel's proper to exist and it is to blame for consistent rocket assaults on Israel and the deaths of harmless Israelis. As for Lieberman, easily he's proper to difficulty warnings approximately Iran? Iran's chief has publicly sworn to wipe Israel off the face of the map - you will possibly desire that all of us take a seat decrease back and enable this ensue, then?

2016-10-02 23:11:35 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Iran IS a threat. It always has been, even before Iraq was invaded and even before Bush labeled it as an Axis of Evil country.

When Bush was talking about invading Iraq earlier this decade, I always thought he had his aim off a bit - countries like North Korea and Iran were, and still are, legitimate threats, and yet he did nothing about them.

2007-10-28 08:35:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think you need more spinach so you can tune in on things. Yes, Iran is a threat because the 'sly fox' Iranian president says so himself that he wants to wipe Israel off the map and destroy America. Wake up from your slumber!

2007-10-28 18:59:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes sir, thats what he wants us to believe. That man is persistant with his ignorance. Iran is a spec on the map. They're still using old rushing AK-47's while we have a 600billion dollar yearly defense budget. Why would we believe that Iran could realistically be a threat to us. If he wants to continue is politics of fear, atleast do it with something feasible.

2007-10-28 08:36:17 · answer #6 · answered by Angerman414 2 · 1 1

shame on the USA, if you let him.
the rest of the world expects you to stand up & say NO.
iran like iraq will be all about the OIL.
the vast north-western desert in iraq is now kurdish & they've already signed the contracts.
turkey have accused iran of arming the rebels, instantly tarred as terrorists, perfect for bush & his spin.

like i've said we expect you to stand up to him.

2007-10-28 08:49:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Apparently he does. I agree that this war has no purpose. But no matter what don't start believing that our government is out to get us. AKA : the 9/11 Loose Change conspiracy theory. - because it's WRONG !!!

2007-10-28 08:43:36 · answer #8 · answered by <3shorty<3 3 · 0 1

God, are you people all delusional? Bush was trying to put down terrorism, not further it. We (He) did not launch an attack on our own people, we were viciously attacked by towel headed cowards who cant come out and confront us like rational people. They would rather inflict terror (hence the name "terrorists") on all who, like us will stand up and not put up with their like any more!!

2007-10-28 10:46:12 · answer #9 · answered by Brett C 4 · 1 0

Since you seem sure they are not a threat, feel free to move there.

2007-10-28 08:33:22 · answer #10 · answered by oklatom 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers