Do you think its fair for people to criticize President Bush after all the find work he has done for America?

Question

He brought the nation together.
He gave every working American a tax rebate check.
Out of the five President that I have witness in my life time I have never seen someone so compassionate as him. The way he reassure me and my family at night that we will not be attack again not on his watch by these terrorist. I wish he could run for a 3rd term.

Answer 1

I think I'm gona puke.

Answer 2

He brought the nation together to hate him and his policies. He also helped polarize people.

He gave average Americans all of $300 whoopee! That won't pay my utilities for one month.

He wouldn't know compassion if it jumped up and bit him in the butt. The recent veto of the bill that would help families get medical care for their kids is a great example of his lack of compassion.

If Homeland Security and the military are doing their jobs there is no reason to expect we will be attacked again. We are much more alert now than we obviously were in 2001. Also Bush ignored the warnings about Bin Laden given him by Clinton.

He stole two elections I don't think anyone wants him to steal a third.

Answer 3

No you are right the employer who has paid for Bush's wage has no right to determine the value of his work

It is the political employee who should at all times write his own legacy and be free to determine his or her job perfromance not the people who paid him fed him and put clothes on his childrens backs for these 6 yrs that are going to bleed into 8

Although the American people hired him and paid him they have no right to be the judge of his performance at all

I appaud you now for pointing out the flaws of the American peoples who think they have the right to determine the performance of their employee -

It is wrong - they should just shut up and let the President tell them how he did for those years clearly 80 % of Americans who fed him are ungratefull and have no clue and should realize the facts pointed out here by you today

Frankly I am offended that they even have the gaul to think they are entitled to an opinion just because they hired and employee paid him fed him and his family and then were somehow unhappy

If only those 80 % would shut up and be respectfull of the guy they pay for and realize that their opinion is not welcomed after all they are so unqualified -

Answer 4

The find work??? Find??? The word is fine!! Enough said about that issue. The man is ready to start WW3 and you think he pulled the nation togeter. His rating is less than 26%. The country has never been more split as it is now. Other countries hate the U.S. and Bush. You obviously have not read a thing.

Answer 5

Yes I think it is fair to critiicize Bush..............how did he bring the nation together?By ignoring national security until AFTER we were attacked?Thus violating his oath of office to protect and defend the constitution(by extension America)!
He got a warning on August 6,2001 that Bin Laden was determined to strike inside the US.The FBI in Minneapolis had Moussaoui the 20th hijacker in custody for weeks before 9/11.Why did FBI HQ in washington deny Minneapolis' repeated requests for FISA warrants in the weeks before 911?

What orders did Bush give to ensure national security after he got that warning?
I asked this question an hour ago have yet to get a real answer..............except from those blaming Clinton.....who had been out of office for 8 months!

Answer 6

Bush in inspired by his advisors. His guidelines are in accordance with what's contained in the great pastime of u.s. ! There are "undesirable and evil" each and every the position, which include India. used atomic bombs in Japan: to maintain American lives. chemical bombs(in Iraq): WP ,suposedly on uninhabbited builings(maximum human beings are ignorant of this no valid danger perception from those international locations: We were at conflict with Japan, and ,have not you heard, "the completed international theory Saddam had WMD, and we are at conflict with Iran in Iraq interefere contained in the own concerns of different international locations.: definite, we deliver help, alow a number of their citzens to becom human beings, enable them to come back the following to be knowledgeable, with financcil assistance and so on... ... any jihadi or the so referred to as rogue international locations: definite, if a danger to American pastimes. They created Saddam Hussein and osaman bin encumbered ..they help Pakistan : Aided Saddam Hussein and Osaman Bin encumbered, in Americas pastime ...Pakistan were given nuclear tech from an similar position India were given it they're the biggest polluters ...: u.s. has reliable EPA familiar, yet should be more suitable suitable. we would want to continually ALL pollute a lot less, yet funds overides lengthy time period safe practices and stability. How can human beings ever sleep contained in the evening?: We sense fairly preserve residing the following. i'm no longer a Bush fan. He listens to the wealthy and in no way the majoriry. i'm in "jihad" well-known. it truly is a consistent warfare to what's sweet even as evil is everywhere. there is an end to it, his call is Jesus. Muslim, Hindu, Christian and so on, all of us go with to love oneanother. "there is not any longer some thing it truly is incorrect with u.s. that can not be fixed with what's sweet with u.s."

Answer 7

I think it's fair to criticize and impeach him!
The Bush presidency is a total failure.
In his acceptance speech at the Republican convention in 2000 Bush said:when America goes to war the goal must be clear, the cause must be just and victory must be overwhelming.0 out of three if you ask me.He deliberately mislead people to believe he was going to be more isolationist claiming Clinton had stretched the military too far.That 9/11 changed everything might work for some uninformed conservatives but is easily debunked by the number and importance of the position he gave to PNAC members in his administration.An organization that stands for Imperialism which is the complete opposite as what he promised
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slmr024JYaA
http://zfacts.com/p/775.html
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/100102_bush_advisors.html
http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

Quotes "The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our Number one priority and we will not rest until we find him!"
- President Bush, September 13, 2001
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- President Bush, March 13, 2002

In the Bush administration "the negation of truth is so systematic. Dishonest accounting, willful scientific illiteracy, bowdlerized federal fact sheets, payola paid to putative journalists, 'news' networks run by right-wing apparatchiks, think tanks devoted to propaganda rather than thought, the purging of intelligence gatherers and experts throughout the bureaucracy whose findings might refute the party line -- this is the machinery of mendacity...The point here is not the hypocrisy involved, though that is egregious. The point is the downgrading of truth and honesty from principles with universal meaning to partisan weapons to be sheathed or drawn as necessary. No wonder the Bush administration feels no compunction to honor the truth or seek it; it conceives truth as a tactic, valuable only insofar as it is useful against one's enemies.

Although European countries declared their solidarity with the United States after September 11, they were increasingly uncomfortable with Washington’s emphasis on unilateralist approaches to global problems. After President Bush took office in 2001, his administration upset many European leaders by refusing to sign the Kyoto Protocol on global warming, opposing the International Criminal Court, and killing the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. In October 2001, Washington was reluctant at first to use the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the campaign to oust the Taliban in Afghanistan. While taken aback by U.S. reluctance, NATO leaders and Europeans generally approved of the U.S.-led operation.

The CIA field commander for the agency's Jawbreaker team at Tora Bora, Gary Berntsen, says he and other U.S. commanders did know that bin Laden was among the hundreds of fleeing Qaeda and Taliban members. Berntsen says he had definitive intelligence that bin Laden was holed up at Tora Bora—intelligence operatives had tracked him—and could have been caught...
In his book—titled "Jawbreaker"—the decorated career CIA officer criticizes Donald Rumsfeld's Defense Department for not providing enough support to the CIA and the Pentagon's own Special Forces teams in the final hours of Tora Bora, says Berntsen's lawyer, Roy Krieger. (Berntsen would not divulge the book's specifics, saying he's awaiting CIA clearance.) That backs up other recent accounts, including that of military author Sean Naylor, who calls Tora Bora a "strategic disaster" because the Pentagon refused to deploy a cordon of conventional forces to cut off escaping Qaeda and Taliban members. Maj. Todd Vician, a Defense Department spokesman, says the problem at Tora Bora "was not necessarily just the number of troops."
http://www.newsweek.com/id/38192
http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000688.htm

Not only France and Germany opposed the Iraq War. Even in countries where leaders supported the U.S. policy, a majority of Europeans opposed an invasion absent the backing of allies and the UN. Certainly, Europeans had an aversion to war because they experienced violent conflicts on their own soil within recent memory. Moreover, European countries were already trying to assist the United States in Afghanistan, where there was at least a connection between the attacks on the United States in 2001 and the subsequent military operation.
In the months leading up to the war and in the years since, the Bush administration has shown occasional callousness toward long-time European allies. The failure of intelligence and the troubled occupation of Iraq have only made these diplomatic problems worse.

Answer 8

That's a fair question.
Yes, I think it's not only fair - but it's inevitable that in a democracy, people with a view point that differs from the president's should voice their discontent, even if it means criticizing the president's policies.
I would like to emphasize, however, that reasonable dissent doesn't include outright disrespect.

Answer 9

Sarcasm?

Answer 10

I do like this president a lot. He has restored Honor & Dignity to the White House after the Clinton years.

Answer 11

You are joking, RIGHT??---Because No one could be that naive.....NO ONE !!
He is a total and complete failure and a bumbling idiot at that.