Some of the good choices are:
1. Since she didnt do anything good in her first 2 terms in the white house, what makes you think she deserves a third term in office?
2. Do we really someone who's only experience in the military was being the wife of a draft dodger as the head of our armed forces?
3. Altho the time has come for a woman president, electing her will hurt women in politics in the future for years to come, that is, if we ever get out of the mess she puts us in.
4. Do we really think that, somehow, she could accomplish as president what she could not accomplish as first lady?
2007-10-28 08:06:11 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hillary Clinton is a snake.
The Clinton campaign finances have been more than questionable, they have been illegal, for a long time
Her goal as a politican is to subjugate the people of the U.S. by making them believe that everyone needs government aid in one form or another. She wants the people to become dependent on these social programs so that she might secure more votes, to gain more power, and further her cause.
She is the master of elusive speech. I dont want a president who says one thing, means another, but says that she means something entirely different.
She would not be good for our foreign policy.
She could not be a good wartime president.
She cannot be counted on to secure the blessings and security of this great nation.
2007-10-28 08:14:46 · answer #1 · answered by I carried Old Glory proudly 2 · 2⤊ 6⤋
She shouldn't. Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the experience, interior the protection stress or intelligence sectors of our government to be effectual in a time as quickly as we are struggling with a conflict oversees and carrying out a broader “conflict” on terrorism. in many situations, this does not be an impediment, and there have been many stable Presidents, without serious protection stress credentials –– her husband being certainly one of them. although, so as to rectify the quagmire that Bush has have been given us in, and likewise to redirect the “conflict on Terrorism” extra efficiently, and faraway from this cowboy/Rambo technique employed via Bush and his henchmen, demands someone of the two protection stress or strategic competence. Hillary could be a stellar coverage maker on the kinfolk front, yet appropriate now we want somebody who demonstrates mastery of the two protection stress approaches and distant places international kin.
2016-10-14 06:44:19 · answer #2 · answered by derverger 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Has no idea what a military is for, except to be the brunt of her contempt.
2. Has no idea what it's like to have to earn a real living, pay a mortgage, or pay for health care, only lie sideways in the public trough while living in government supplied housing for most of her adult life and being supplied with free health care and food.
3. Has no idea what a kitchen is or how to poach an egg.
4. Is such a narcissist that she everything is "all about her".
5. Has no self respect, because if she did, she would have gotten rid of that bum she married a long time a go.
I could go on, but there isn't enough bandwidth to transmit it all.
2007-10-28 10:04:25 · answer #3 · answered by largecar8 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
She's a Republican in Democrat clothing.
1. She wasn't President, only the first lady, they have no power.
2. Bush and Cheney were draft dodgers also.
3. Having a woman President can't hurt women.
4. possibly
2007-10-28 08:09:12 · answer #4 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 8⤊ 3⤋
White Water, Castle Grande , Travelgate, Mike Espy, Filegate, Golfgate, ex-White House aide David Watkins' , Indonesiagate, William Kennedy, Jim and Susan McDougal, Bernard Nussbaum, Sherry Rowlands, Dick Morris. And the list could go on and on....Good reasons not to vote for hillary, any one of the above
2007-10-28 08:26:24 · answer #5 · answered by SFC_Ollie 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
she was first lady, not an elected offical. Should you be mad at W. for what HW. couldn't do? Being related to the person doesn't make you the president.
2007-10-28 08:14:14 · answer #6 · answered by just some chick 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
1. She wasn't the President.
2. Bush was AWOL!!
3. It takes a Clinton to clean up after a BUSH.
4. It was not her job to accomplish anything but be a good will ambassador.
5. Clinton was the best president this country ever had.
2007-10-28 08:11:14 · answer #7 · answered by largemarge 1 · 9⤊ 5⤋
Hillary Clinton.
2007-10-28 08:14:37 · answer #8 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Too little change with Hillary BushLite.
2007-10-28 08:13:37 · answer #9 · answered by Todo 2 · 6⤊ 1⤋
She is a socialist. An we don't need another four years of Bill Clinton and his cabinet again. We saw what he did and didn't do to protect this country. The USA will have some very big issues to deal with over then next four years and we need some in office who can make the hard decision without fear of their political careers. The world is changing and those changes will directly effect the US. This next president can't play politics with our lives. Plus we know that socialism does not work.
2007-10-28 08:09:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 10⤋