English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What about a new direction without the baggage of the old? No more accusations of "lemmings", "conformity", or "closeminded"? A direction for the hope of a better future? One drawn not by party lines but rather the lack thereof? To establish individualality, not group dynamics? One of discipline, open-mindedness, moral, logic, compassion, and mental freedom? A party of mind and body, not money? To encourage each individual to push him/herself to his/her maximum physical and mental capacity, and help all those who need it? To establish trust, goodwill, and honor as currency?

A transcendental wing?

2007-10-28 07:07:25 · 5 answers · asked by Mitchell 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Common Sense:
Thus my reason for a new direction. So there aren't any "lemmings".

2007-10-28 07:17:31 · update #1

5 answers

Hawking sure will support you.
Perhaps we will have a multidimensional
arrangement in parliaments eventually.
So far USA features black and white.
DOS 6.22 so to speak. Let's wait for Linux.

2007-10-28 07:12:34 · answer #1 · answered by Todo 2 · 3 1

I'm all for it but here in the real world it won't happen.

We just need to choose our leaders smartly and not based on who has the most tv exposure, which means we have to research who we can vote for.

Its cause of my research I am going with Thompson and Hunter as my preferences.

2007-10-28 14:32:45 · answer #2 · answered by Spartacus 3 · 1 2

I like it, however that would be kind of patriotic which as I have found out is very unpopular. But anything is better than confrontational debates without compromise.

2007-10-28 14:14:43 · answer #3 · answered by rance42 5 · 4 2

Go into special operations. You'll get all that and more.

2007-10-28 14:18:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Why? Words like "lemmings", "conformity", and "closedminded" are all very good descriptions of neolibs.

2007-10-28 14:14:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers