Would you agrue Germany has a right to defend itself or would you say heh that guy is talking about genocide let's take him out?
2007-10-28 07:01:38 · 10 answers · asked by Spartacus 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He was PRACTICING genocide. I hope we would have seen (much sooner) that the guy was not just a threat but a real-live mass murderer. It would absolutely have been an act of responsibility to take him out. Not to would have been a HUGE, COSTLY mistake. Makes you think of Ahmadinijead (sp?) huh?
2007-10-28 07:14:28 · answer #1 · answered by Cinner 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Hitler totally mislead his populace; the leadership during that period of time, managed to evolve quickly over time into something quite grotesque, unlawful, and an entire Nation was mislead via unsound practices.
The language used during that particular leadership; seemed quite up n up at the time to the persons who were gradually conditioned to respond to such nasty ideas.
Modern Germany; however, has formed a sound Government. Back then, during the attrocities of hitler's germany--they had the right to defend themselves and lose.
Any form of genocide is inappropriate; and it is very rare any government will tell you they are going to commit genocide--if they act within genocide, it is a citizen's responsibility to raise the concern.
(short form response)
2007-10-28 14:08:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Germania was NOT defending herself.
The nuclear options of them were vastly
overestimated, as reviews show, mainly
useful as crafted excuse for US budgets
consequently leading to killing of 300,000
women and children in Japan for no reason.
2007-10-28 14:07:53 · answer #3 · answered by Todo 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Totally Moot. No one really knew what an atomic bomb was then so it is like saying, If Rome had jet bombers could they have stopped the Huns.
2007-10-28 14:09:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I agree.
Britain did want to go to war to eliminate Hitler but unfortunately France and the US rejected the idea until it was too late.
2007-10-28 14:05:56 · answer #5 · answered by Laurence B 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He DID try to build a nuclear bomb! Further we DID take him out! What's your point?
If Todo thinks that dropping the bombs on Japan was "for no reason," then he really is ill-informed about history, particularly of this error and, therefore, is ill-equipped to answer this question.
2007-10-28 14:11:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
we did not know what it could do then, but if we did YES because they where not supposed to be arming, something about Versailles treaty or something. he was building the 1930's equivalent in the Bismarck V1 & V2
2007-10-28 14:08:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It depends, are we assuming that he has already shown the ability to destroy the lives of millions, by droppping one or two on civilian targets, or showing that a country that has had this history, is threatening him?
nice strawman argument, by the way.
2007-10-28 14:07:01 · answer #8 · answered by Boss H 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Most of the world at that time didn't understand the power of the atom............at that time.So the question is ridiculous to even ask!
2007-10-28 14:09:15 · answer #9 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Hitler was trying to build a nuke (why did he want the water from Norway so badly?), and so were the Japanese.
Myself...well, I'm glad we beat them to it.
2007-10-28 14:11:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋