Is Stallone a liberal terrorist?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambo_III
2007-10-28 03:41:39 · 8 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
kveryeffective I understand the context and agree a proxy war with them was at the time a best interest. When do freedom fighters become terrorist and vise versa and what is this context with other countries?
2007-10-28 03:55:12 · update #1
Probably because it was......A MOVIE!!!!
2007-10-28 04:06:21 · answer #1 · answered by johnhdavisjrusa20 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That movie was deceiving cold war propaganda. It's a very good movie for educational purposes if you look at it with what we know now. The Soviet Union would have stabilized Afghanistan if the CIA didn't help the Taliban and Muslim fanatics. Rambo three is evidence how the US government did use the popular media to spread lies.
Look at it now and realize how far the rabbit hole goes. That movie is pure disgusting propaganda, nothing less
2007-11-01 08:26:02 · answer #2 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is very subjective because one mans terrorist is anothers freedom fighter.but since we did help those maggots against a common enemy that in vaded them and we did not invade alqaedastan and they killed thounsands of civilians I think we are in the right and Rambo today would be no doubt be hunting and killing those former freedom fighters who now fight to oppress thier fellow man. I know the reversal well I still have my soldier of fortune magazines from those days, it was a just cause our proxy war with the USSR and a lot of Bin Ladens murder monkeys and binLaden him self are monsters we created now we must put them down.
2007-10-28 11:08:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Context
Mujahideen was fighting the Russians.
At that time we were still at odds with Russia.
2007-10-28 10:51:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
we shall have to wait for rambo part 5 to see what happens next
coming to a theater near you soon
2007-10-28 10:59:45 · answer #5 · answered by Spartacus 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He was a fictional character...a Vietnam vet with PTSD who was angry at the US government.
2007-10-28 11:10:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because he got to kill russians.
2007-10-28 10:47:23 · answer #7 · answered by contact_wraith 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
hey what about that "Topper Harly" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107144/
2007-10-28 10:51:31 · answer #8 · answered by Will 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋