a) Is it when all the pockets of insurgents are dead?
b) Is it when all Iraqis have electricity, education and food?
c) Is it when Iraqi Refugees start coming home?
d) Is it when all 3 sects agree to live peacefully with each other?
e) Is it when the Iraqi Military is as strong as the America/contractor one?
f) Is it when the Iraqi people ask you to leave?
g) All of the above
h) Or will this war never end and troops will stay there indefinitely so that a civil war can never break out?
i) other_____________
j) oil runs out
2007-10-28 03:15:16 · 16 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
KRR defend themselves from what?
2007-10-28 03:19:02 · update #1
KRR I am just asking because it can vary, protect herself from insurgents, civil war, Turkey or Iran can all vary in time.
2007-10-28 03:24:46 · update #2
Gee it's G. but like every other war we've been in, we'll be there for a great-long while: see Germany & Japan.
2007-10-28 03:22:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is just my opinion but I believe it is - f) When the Iraqi people ask us to leave. And I believe it is waaay past time to have an Iraqi national election on it. Then if we leave and the country implodes at least it was their choice, and if we stay then the rest of the world can see we are there by the will of the Iraqi people and not just because GW says so.
I used this answer once before and got a ton of thumbs down and I have to wonder if they were mostly from those who are afraid of losing their biggest Bush bashing tool?
2007-10-28 05:22:28 · answer #2 · answered by Bishop 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i don't have an difficulty for unlawful immigration. I do have a situation with the present quota equipment. enable me furnish you with an social gathering. if you're a Mexican who's the son or daughter of a US citizen, you've gotten had to demonstrate screen for a eco-friendly card in 1991 to be eligible to change into an eternal resident at present. on the different hand, if you're not to any extent further from Mexico, you've utilized for a eco-friendly card in 2001 and grew to change into an eternal resident by now. If everybody ought to describe how that distinction would nicely be defined by some thing yet racial animus adverse to Mexicans (and Indians and Filipinos, apparently), i'm all ears.
2016-10-23 02:35:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IJ27Ak03.html
Check it out. Troubles with the Iranian allies may keep the fires burning. Add if The Supreme Leader removes the Revolutionary Guard... if he can... and President AMDJ...
i) Other
A stabilized Embassy to aide in a better program offering Democracy & negotiations in the neighboring area's ... the current elected officials are meek. US must concede to the Supreme Leader desires for nuclear energy vs WW3. Guided by UN and so forth that is not too much to ask to remove his problems... yet they may become Iraq's. Thanks.
You may never get G. J? perhaps.
E goes along with my other (assumed)
2007-10-28 03:35:18 · answer #4 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is won, when they pass that "divvy up the oil" bill, that Bush has been pressuring them on. It has already been drafted for a while now, but not passed. Wonder why that is? Think they might know that once it is, Bush could care less what happens to the rest of their resources?
2007-10-28 10:46:46 · answer #5 · answered by Boss H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm going to go with a modified "E", and by that I mean there were regions within Iraq that previously had the ability to defend themselves and our administration went ahead and said no and stayed in those regions.
I want to be clear, I'm for our prescense in Iraq to eliminate Saddam Hussien but I strongly feel that ever since theres been so many policy mistakes that now its a dissaster.
2007-10-28 03:32:39 · answer #6 · answered by Spartacus 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
With rising tension in the area, I see another Battle Group being moved to the Arabian Sea. So my answer is none of the above.
2007-10-28 03:26:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question is a fair one and judging by some of the responses, it hit a nerve.
I've asked the same question and received the same type of responses.
If the white house could give us something to look forward to, it would make things much more tolerable. We just want HONEST answers.
2007-10-28 03:55:39 · answer #8 · answered by katydid 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think there is only 1 real criteria
Get that Oil pumping, and flooding the market.
2007-10-28 04:03:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
None of the above. It is when Iraq is stable enough to govern and defend herself.
2007-10-28 03:18:22 · answer #10 · answered by KRR 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋