this shows how shallow Homos and the Dems really are and i'm really disapointed in Fox for giving 1 minute to this non story.It is not news worthy a formerly gay minister/ singer performs and .....damn how do you even try to make news with this
2007-10-28 02:25:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I watched that interview even as it first aired and checked it out again by your link. the following is the version, which should be glaring to very just about all and distinctive. maximum Republicans that are agitated sufficient about gay marriage to rant on about it a million) supported the attempt to characteristic discrimination to our structure - Obama does no longer, 2) do no longer help even the bestowal of equivalent legal rights from civil unions - Obama does, 3) trust that their non secular perspectives might want to carry sway over all of this - Obama made it sparkling it really is not any longer what he thinks, 4) act as although their very marriages are threatened by the union of gay companions - Obama make it sparkling he does no longer sense that way. In different words, Obama isn't a ranting, insecure heterosexual that reflects lack of expertise and spews inflammatory nonsense about gay human beings. The non secular good does do all of that on a on a daily basis foundation. Liberals are all in favour of differing evaluations spoken respectfully and carefully without slippery slope nonsense and cherry picked Bible verses. What they don't look to be for are those who function from a position of irrationality and bigotry - and that is what we listen from Republicans adverse to gay marriage more suitable regularly than no longer.
2016-10-23 02:34:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How can the GOP attack Obama for having a friend who voiced sentiments that most conservatives share? Besides, if the issue of candidates friends comes up, then so will the issue of Giuliani's friend, Monsignor Alan Placa, who a grand jury has accused of child molestation.
2007-10-28 02:38:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama had not supported the gays as a Democrat. Thus, he might lose the support of a noisy group who could have been cooperative with his camp for 2008.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-10-28 02:17:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Cheney's daughter
R. Reagan's daugher
Giuliani
??? about H. Clinton
Bush brother Neil
all gays
GA = ( ) Attack
2007-10-28 02:17:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Whitest_American 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is my belief the the "O" man is a leather and lace man and the "Pole and Hole" guys along with the Dikes on Bikes don't like the way he accessorizes. Feathers and leather....how goosh!
2007-10-28 02:43:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My God, I just sympatize for him he is innocent. He should raise up head and not despair for politics is a dirty game at most. Hillary is going to dig all out to have him done.
2007-10-28 02:16:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by nelwes 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
He called homosexuality a 'curse'.
2007-10-28 02:18:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by mike h 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
He will not come out of the closet
2007-10-28 02:15:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Cool. I love it when the kooky liberals fight amongst themselves. It's entertaining.
2007-10-28 02:14:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋