English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

no good has ever come from toying with mother-nature.
i don't think so.
mother-nature has a habit of biting back!

EDIT .
http://www.biotech-info.net/lancet_risks.html
results from further tests into the long-term health risks for GM foods is still pending & monsanto are busy suppressing.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3076781/
babies conceived through IVF or another technique known as intracytoplasmic sperm injection,
or ICSI, were more than twice as likely as naturally conceived infants to have major birth defects.

2007-10-28 02:01:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

That is quite a moral question! Hmm. Being a Christian, I say no. Since we can't see the whole picture, how do we know we would be bettering the species in the long haul?

2007-10-29 07:06:07 · answer #2 · answered by SavvySue 7 · 1 0

Absolutely. That is our mission. Right now, we suck at it.

Medicine has become our primary form of commerce, but, because of competition, large chunks of money go into advertising campaigns that could be diverted elsewhere. The same is true in all areas of health care, which is the primary reason why it should be socialized.

Do I need to expand further? Do we want to talk about packaging?

2007-10-28 02:11:26 · answer #3 · answered by TD Euwaite? 6 · 1 0

Mother Nature: Don't mess with my works of art

2007-10-28 02:15:53 · answer #4 · answered by Holiday Magic 7 · 2 0

Only to aid our own extinction. We always do stuff without understanding the consequences, and one day, one of these advancement in science will being about out end.

2007-10-28 02:12:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

no, i believe that "manipulating" nature is what is causing alot of the problems the world is facing...

2007-10-28 02:01:44 · answer #6 · answered by ὀκτάπους 5 · 1 1

This is something we do all the time.
I'll rephrase it we have always done it but only for the betterment of a few

2007-10-28 02:00:58 · answer #7 · answered by The Rugby Player 7 · 1 0

we already manipulate it enough, cut down trees, destroy lands for oils, (companies) pollute the oceans by dropping chemical waste

2007-10-28 03:24:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If you mean creating things like the seedless watermelon, then yes. If manupulating means 'burning down' then no.

2007-10-28 02:00:10 · answer #9 · answered by BHS Via Sol 5 · 2 0

Only to deflect dangerous storms or give rain to drought stricken areas.

2007-10-28 01:59:49 · answer #10 · answered by starcharlieblue 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers