All one has to do to do to see what the result would be is to look at what Turkey did to the Christian Armenians. And if you want to cut and run it will not be in Euro Asia it will be here.
Of course the ones here doing this are the same ones who cry about Darfur and will not act just like the left who told Woodrow Wilson not to help the Armenians. What about the rape and murder of the Iraq people under Sadam? You can not pick and chose to fit your agenda. It is right or it is wrong.
And for the right who supports the war which I do to deny the Genocide of our Christian brothers and sisters is to have the blood on your souls. We do not need Turkey any where to what they need us and to allow them to tell us what to do is to SURRENDER THE USA AND OUR MORALS.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071028/ap_on_re_us/iraq_war_protest;_ylt=AsG7.ZwJ1E2WTrNGYt8Hokas0NUE
2007-10-28
01:11:24
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
The left will not look at facts and for this they have the blood of many on their heads.
2007-10-28
01:22:34 ·
update #1
hey kegan why dont you allow e-mails as you are a coward to face off.
Do not worry I am not flaging you as i love it when you show every one the face in the mirror of you and your kind.
2007-10-28
08:09:29 ·
update #2
Don't forget about Amy Goodman. She is definitely in this league.
You are right, there has been ample proof of the rape, murder and genocide endured by the Iraqis under Saddam and we cannot pick and choose who is worthy of life and who is worthy of death. However, obviously we must employ a system of priorities. At this point in time, the upheaval in Iraq is at our hands and we must finish our task until safety rest among the people.
"Every living soul is a poem written on the back of God's hand." - Michael Franti & Spearhead
2007-10-28 02:04:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by wider scope 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Just like in Vietnam, if we run away from Iraq there will be a news blackout instead of a daily obsession by the left. The 3 or 4 million who died in S.E. Asia as the communists swept into the power vaccuum was out of sight and mind to the liberals, so they didn't have to care. It was enough that we weren't involved. Ted Kennedy went so far as to cut supplies to the the remaining S. Vietnamese allies. They celebrated the pullout of Vietnam and put "Free Tibet" bumber stickers on their cars, thinking themselves humanitarians.
2007-10-28 01:20:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Sheehan and the "left" are not the only ones who want to end our war of choice in Iraq, the majority of all Americans do.
http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq.htm
You say "You can not pick and chose to fit your agenda. It is right or it is wrong" That's a very odd statement to make about the Iraq war which was very much Bush's war of choice Members of the Bush administration began talking about striking Iraq one day after 9-11-01 though there was never any evidence Saddam was connected to the attacks.
Christians have been persecuted as a RESULT of the Iraq war. "Iraq's Persecuted Christians" http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101040927-699409,00.html
2007-10-28 01:33:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Looks like a question from another right wing evangelical terrorist who still falsely believes that the war on terrorism is a crusade against non Christian religions. Hey bastard, why don't you just move to Virginia Beach and enjoy the bigotted and ignorant love fest of those similar to you under the tutelage of a real terrorist, you master and overlord: Pat Robertson. Please do the world a favor and committ suicide, even though you won't since you still believe the hypocritical teaches a book of myth of fiction.
2007-10-28 04:41:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by kegan_80 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
First - I was not aware we were at war with "Islam" - I am sure our allies in pakistan would be surprised
Second - do you really have such little faith in America that you believe a tiny minority here can rob us all of our faith if we stop invading sovereign nations half the world away?
Thirdly
"You can not pick and chose to fit your agenda. It is right or it is wrong"
So when are Republicans going to insist we invade Saudi Arabia and remove the brutal regime there?
2007-10-28 01:50:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
You’ve obviously surrendered to propaganda and inanity. Attacking the dissenters will not make Bush’s cause more just.
Bush seems to think that we need Turkey very much so maybe you should take up your arguments with him and his supporters and stop bashing the people who want this insanity to end.
2007-10-28 01:49:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by quest for truth gal 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
THE CINDY SHEEHANS OF THE WORLD ARE TRULY
DANGEROUS. THEY WILL ALLOW SHARIA LAW TO START TAKING OVER IN THIS COUNTRY.
2007-10-29 06:19:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
For the foul mouth kegan_80 ..........This question is about real life , so back to your vision of reality in the "Pokemon and Nintendo" games you mind numbed hack !
2007-10-28 08:07:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
What about the rape of the Iraq people under Sadam? Do you have proof or was that from Fox News and CNN = Exxon Corporation
Serbs killing Muslims? Adviser of the Serb was an American by the name of H. Kissinger
Ever heard of a "Noble Lie"? Created by the father of the Neoconservative............ who was a German Nazi
2007-10-28 01:16:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Whitest_American 3
·
2⤊
7⤋
The lies that led to Shock and Awe have now morphed into lies that attempt to mask their own complicity. These are the deceptions that continue to kill and maim hundreds of thousands of people. The attacks against Cindy Sheehan are in response to her powerful and truthful message and do not require any rebuttal whatsoever. The attacks against Cindy Sheehan are vengeful and nasty attacks on Sheehan's person and include such inane accusations that she had abandoned her son, Casey, at the age of 4. She did not. Her marriage of 29 years ended as a result of the stresses brought about The pro-war crowd attacks Cindy Sheehan as a mom, because they know this hurts her deeply. The despicable behavior of the few remaining supporters of the Bush regime suggests that attacking others is, like attacking Iraq, a fixed mindset, a misguided zealotry for a lost cause, and resentment for having to be held responsible for the debacle. Yes, pro-warriors and Bushites, the deaths of 660,000 Iraqis, over 3,000 US folk, hundreds of “coalition” troops, hundreds of thousands of people maimed and suffering IS on your hands.
It is the Right wing lowlife who invents stories of Cindy Sheehan's bad motherhood and marriage. If George W. Bush had a mother as loving and caring as Cindy Sheehan, he would not so callously kill and send others to be killed. If G.W. Bush had a family life like that of Casey Sheehan, George, Jr. would understand what death and the loss of a loved one is. If George W. Bush were Cindy Sheehan's son, he would know what attending a funeral for a loved one was all about, and he would have attended his first funeral for a dead U.S. citizen who died because of his lies and deception. Casey Sheehan's parents did not go golfing when one of their children died. George W. Bush's parents did. Cindy Sheehan's mind is deeply troubled by the death and destruction in Iraq. George W. Bush's mother, Barbara Bush's mind, is another matter altogether. Barbara Bush said,
...why should we hear about body bags, and deaths, and how many...Or, I mean, it's not relevant. So why would I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?
Why should George W. Bush suffer? People like Cindy Sheehan are supposed to do that. Then be attacked by the Right wing gang who protect their inept “president” from paying for his crimes by making the innocent pay for them.
2007-10-28 01:15:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by somber 3
·
4⤊
4⤋