If Maddy was 'snatched to order' then someone seriously slipped up. Her eyes are a dead giveaway and cannot be disguised. And I don't understand why that Brit was just deported from Morocco. Surely he or she should have been charged with something under Moroccan law, because at the very least he was interfering with a police investigation by laying a false trail.
2007-10-28 02:27:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by threepenny53 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nope. If you choose to believe the newspapers[comics] you will stay confused. These are the same responsible papers that have hounded a decent man - Lewis Hailton out of the UK. Hit them were it hurts and save your money.
2007-10-29 08:30:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by James Mack 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very! I think The Mail has shown some important facts - the other day they wrote about 15 suspicious questions, formed by the detectives, that simply makes them guilty as hell. One of which was why did the sniffer dog immediately go the back seat of the McCans car, where the blood spot was? And why did the mother shout "They've taken her" upon her dissaperance?
Everyone has their own opinion, mine is simple - the father Gerry killed her, and she is just protecting him. Apparently he's got a bad temper, and in every interview his face is as hard as stone.
2007-10-28 00:11:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
I agree with renaissance . What is the first thing you would shout out if you noticed you child had gone missing? "They've taken her" or "Maddy's not there shes disappeared"
Well get used to it folks, we will never know. They seem to be clever people. They have had plenty of time to rehearse.
That poor little girl! I hope she alive and well.
2007-10-28 00:19:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
0⤋
It hasn't come out why he was offering money - and I should imagine he would be turning the McCanns in, if he was in a spot of bother on their behalf, don't you? Could you imagine the outcry? We'll have to wait and see. Could be a newspaper reporters, trying to make a name for himself. Who knows?
2007-10-28 01:43:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by True Blue Brit 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
There are a lot of strange and imponderable things about this case, clear all the smoke,untruths and diversions, then all you are left with are the guilty ones,need I say more?
2007-10-28 04:11:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Can you read the News of the World without moving your lips?
Claim, counterclaim, rumour reported as fact, fact reported as rumour, "new" facts unveiled daily, old facts discounted, sightings here there and everywhere, sightings discounted, it's Morocco, no it's not, yes it. Alibis confirmed, alibis denied, accused will stay/won't stay in Portugal, wife swapping, no wife swapping, and I could go on and on and on and on.....
And for every will o' th' wisp story half a dozen inane "questions" at Y!A.
Why bother?
2007-10-28 00:15:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Luke Warnes 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
If you were put all the stories about the McCanns on top of each other the pile would reach to the moon.
2007-10-28 00:21:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by focus 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
its just getting more bizarre by the day
2007-10-28 00:40:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think people shouldn't believe everything they hear or read.
2007-10-28 01:17:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by monkeyface 7
·
3⤊
1⤋