Are school administrators and board members considered "public" figures open to being critisized?

Question

I know politicians, movie starts, business executives are considered public figures and subject to open slander or crticism, but what about school officials? I want to write a very critical piece about my son's school principal and school board director and place it in a blog on the web. It will spell out how these two are life-long personal friends and how it has affected the board directors judgment in accessing and dealing with various controversial issues.

If I am to do this, could I be held liable and sued for slander? I know you can't when it comes to most public figures, like politicians, but what about this scenario?

Answer 1

if you write it and present it as fact not as opinion and it is not true, it does not matter who you write about it could be held against you. if these are elected officials they are public but if they are hired they are employees of the school system regardless you had better only state facts that you have verifiable evidence of or clearly state it is an opinion and that you do not have any evidence.

Answer 2

dropping the identify of atheist had no longer some thing to do with morality or immorality or medical "miracles" or some thing like that. First, "atheist" is an unsatisfying id. it truly is detrimental, and it in simple terms pertains to disbelief in a unmarried proposition. hence, it truly is shallow. So I dropped it, and went on a quest to make your techniques up what I did trust. That led me ultimately to the undeniable fact that God is subjective, no longer purpose. there change into no go with for purpose info any more suitable than there change into go with for purpose info that my well-known type of ice cream fairly is the great contained in the international. I many times do not aspect out that i'm a former atheist because explaining it in finished is regularly more suitable hassle than its well worth, and so i do not engender that distrustful reaction you stated. yet now i'm noticing that if i do not communicate up, some atheists make all kinds of detrimental stereotypes and assumptions about former atheists. edit: No, it really is incorrect. after I say "dropping the identify of atheist" that signifies that i ended utilizing it as an identifier, no longer that I in the hot day went again to believing in deities, purpose or in the different case. i did not like the observe (I felt that it change into shallow and detrimental, as I stated). I used effective words like "naturalist" or "humanist" in the hot day after dropping "atheist"

Answer 3

If you submit it to your local newspaper in the op-ed/letters to the editor columns...it's just your opinion.

Remember opinions: they're like belly buttons...everybody has one.