Well, considering how dumb the supporters of the Awful 7 (Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Giuliani, Romney, Thompson, McCain) are, that's a pretty amazing feat. I'd probably go with the Romney supporters because it is plain obvious that he has flip-flopped on nearly every issue and nobody knows what he actually believes. However, I'm not taking anything away from the rest of the Awful 7's supporters. As a group, the supporters of these candidates are taking ignorance and stupidity to a whole new level.
2007-10-26
14:39:48
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
I'm going to have to pick 2
that would be the Democrats and Republicans for their 25 year history of doing nothing constructive to advance our country in a positive direction
2007-10-26 14:48:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The 40 seven% speech became offhand, no longer formally being recorded, yet became recorded and leaked. It quite and graphically shows him classing 40 seven% of people as deadbeats and not his difficulty. whilst the recordings got here out, he mentioned the comments have been an "errors", like it became a typo. It became a typo that lined on the brink of a 0.5-website; greater of a rant. The Salt Lake Tribune defined that "He had to tell this actual objective audience that to get them to open their checkbooks". a professional speech coach and representative to politicians reported that the 40 seven% speech became the main gentle he had ever heard Romney. It became an errors all appropriate- he spoke with no script, and from the middle. No political adviser or speech author might ever create that kind of commentary, simply by fact they be conscious of it would be political suicide. Romney wasn't clever sufficient to recollect that suggestion, and the certainty got here out. you may wager that once the information got here out, and earlier the 1st debate, Romney strategists had a gathering on revising the image of their candidate. between the top questions might have been "How stupid are the electorate? Will they purchase the "errors" excuse? Will they permit us to alter positions for the controversy and get away with it?" needless to say, they think of electorate are that stupid. The IQ try is coming next month.
2016-10-14 03:54:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would go with either Clinton or Giuliani..
Clinton, just because she is the most popular.. I bet at least 25% of her supporters can't even name two other candidates..
Guiliani, anybody who had Hannity's full blown support has to have a sh@# load of moronic supporters.. Plus he's the front runner of the Rep party, yet he's a liberal.. Stupid people that call themselves "conservative", will claim support..
2007-10-26 14:58:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
The dumbest of all supporters are the "party blind" that will vote for any candidate just because the political party is right.
Every party has them and it is a shame - that some people are to lazy or controllable that their vote doesn't matter to them.
There are places in the world that have no elections or have sham elections where one candidate receives every vote.
To bad some people seem to abuse the right most people can only dream about.
2007-10-26 14:51:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Akkita 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
McCain's, Romney's, and Giuliani's
2007-10-30 12:41:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I normally don't stereotype people, but you have to be completely ignorant to support Rudy Giuliani... he's a disgrace, and at this point so is anyone that supports him
2007-10-26 14:47:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Must be Obama's.
Anyone who supports someone who will raise your taxes, take away most of the rights guaranteed by the "Bill of Rights" and install a Marxist/Socialist government MUST be pretty dumb!
2007-10-26 14:54:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Philip H 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
well, i am going to vote BECAUSE i am glad i live im america where i have 1) the FREEDOM to vote 2) the FREEDOM to openly complain about the canidates & 3 ) have options of candidates to vote for and to complain about.
2007-10-26 14:45:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by bi2unicorn 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul and Hillary Clintons because they dont know the truth about what they're voting for.
And romney since he belongs to a cult
2007-10-26 15:46:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by D S 1
·
0⤊
4⤋
Giuliani's since all he has said since the start has been 911.
2007-10-26 14:44:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Edge Caliber 6
·
4⤊
2⤋