Human race will 'split into two different species'...are the liberals creating a lazy subspecies as we speak?

Question

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=489653&in_page_id=1965

The human race will one day split into two separate species, an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures, according to a top scientist.

100,000 years into the future, sexual selection could mean that two distinct breeds of human will have developed.

The alarming prediction comes from evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry from the London School of Economics, who says that the human race will have reached its physical peak by the year 3000.

Liberals enable lazy, unintelligent, simple-minded people to just EXIST with their entitlements. All able bodied people should contribute to society but all the Liberals expect from the lazy is a VOTE.

Answer 1

They are trying to get a jump on the de-evolutionary process...........

Answer 2

I have seen trends to support some parts of this claim, Though most of it is hyperbole. Wealthy people tend to be more intelligent and have access to more attractive mates. Therefore they have children that are both attractive and intelligent. As a matter of self interest, wealthy people and people with a strong personal work ethic also tend to be conservative. But that is really beside the point. We are breeding a subrace of superkids that are smarter and better looking than average. I don't think that makes them a different species any more than a chiuaua and a great dane are different species. They are both still dogs but they have vastly different traits. It would be more accurate to say that a new breed of humans is developing. Meanwhile the masses are devolving. The less intelligent are less educated, make less money and in our society that means they get a poorer selection of mates. So they breed more stupid ugly children. And the unintelligent tend to reproduce at a higher rate than the well educated. So If this trend in society continues, then the high bred will be vastly outnumbered by ugly morons, but they will still probably be the ruling class. People will always flock to wealth and beauty. That's just the way people are.

Answer 3

First of all that article is crap. It looks like a joke. Believing in this reveals a misunderstanding of evolution driven by natural selection after a species has reached the cognitive capacity not to let it's species diverge like that.
Why would more intelligent human beings sit by for tens of thousands of years and let other members split off into an intellectually inferior species and not do something about it ?
As a liberal I see this happening right now. But I refuse to let conservatives evolve into an inferior species. Which would be exactly what would happen if you cons were allowed to reproduce without the wise advice of liberals influencing your mating decisions.

Answer 4

You do realize the only way to avoid those consequences is to form a society based on equality of wealth, right? This will keep the species mixing well rather than stratifying.

Answer 5

it doesn't say anything about "lazy"... only ugly...

in fact, the "dim-witted ugly" creatures will surely do the vast majority of the manual labor... you know, the real work... where you get your hands dirty and break a sweat...

while the upper class will merely be managers think they are better than the lower race...

much like how you think you're better than democrats and probably don't do as much work as most of them do...

of course, all that physical labor will probably make them physically superior to the upper class and, of course, a revolution would occur, in which much of the upper class would be killed, since they would know little of fighting and have little physical ability...

Answer 6

I don't believe that... liberals are the ones who are highly educated, open-minded, and actually believe in evolution- how on earth could you assume that we'd be the underclass?

Answer 7

This sounds like the Dick Cheney School of Eugenics.

Answer 8

Maybe we -will- split into two species. The conservative species will have no manners and their political discourse will be limited to just throwing their own feces. So naturally they will be easily led around like sheep and happy to vote against their own best interests.

Answer 9

Oh Miss Lovely...you know that evolution is bunk.

Variation within species occurs, but there is *NO* evidence in the fossil record of links between species.

Besides, if evolution were true, there would be no gays, since Libs think that people are born gay. The very same billions of years necessary for transition between species would have weeded out any tendency in people to not reproduce.

Answer 10

Sorry, I haven't read HG Wells in a while. Any other (un)original conservative ideas to spout at us?

Answer 11

<>

Sounds like a cross between Bush and Cheney to me.