She is the ordered Obligor for health insurance. We continue to carry the kids in the event of a catastrophic emergency.
2007-10-26 12:57:32 · 10 answers · asked by h.dembie 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
She is court ordered to provide insurance. In turn we pay more in support. She has to use his Social Security # to file claims. If he failed to meet an order he would be in jail?
2007-10-26 13:14:43 · update #1
The point has always been to ensure that the kids have access to our support. We want them to be healthy and happy. But it dosen't seem legal that she can file claims against his insurance w/o his knowledge. The breakdown for healthcare in his contract is explicitly broken down to insure fairness and accountability.
2007-10-26 14:14:14 · update #2
Since she is ordered to provide the insurance coverage for the kids and obviously is not then she is in violation of the court order. For whatever reason she is not obeying it and using your coverage for the kids, which is good in that the kids are covered at least by you. You can take her back to court for breach of the divorce decree, but probably the most would happen would be a stern warning from the Judge to obey his order but not much more than that. You can tell her to obey it or youll go back to court and see if that works, otherwise its going to cost you. Good luck
2007-10-26 13:47:30 · answer #1 · answered by Arthur W 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the children are still covered under his insurance then yes she can. Sounds to me as if she was ordered to get medical insurance that would become primary on the children which would make his secondary but she hasn't done so. That is up to the court to take care of, if they want to enforce her getting insurance on the children or not. They may not since they are already covered under his. If it really bother's you then I suggest you go to court.
2007-10-26 17:58:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This subject will take greater beneficial than a trifling "room," i'm afraid. Even a ceremonial dinner hall could be inadequate. i'm not sure if any tensions could be eased, yet i will make a extreme-high quality make the main of cost tag revenues. i could %. 2 of my exes especially and have them each and every sort a soccer group chosen from something of the different previous contestants. the two communities then start to %. eachother's gamers off one via one on the grid iron. The survivors improve to the subsequent point. i could % the two former contestants who're likely to be victorious. lower back, the two chosen substitute into group captains, choosing their contributors from those in the queue. Their project is to construct 2 distant-controlled conflict bots, each and every with the aptitude to thoroughly annihilate the opposing group. All contributors are then ushered right into a locked area the place a no-regulations conflict would be waged. The survivors (if any) improve to the third point. For the only stunning point the relax contestants are seated with their bare feet in a crammed youngster's wading pool. each and every participant is declared to a heavy-accountability truck battery. The batteries are each and every related to "Operation" video games. those (if any) who be waiting to extract all their products and nonetheless have cognitive features get to declare something they % to/approximately me.
2016-10-02 21:24:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ya know, bottom line is the kids need insurance. Doesn't matter who provides it. I know that my kids have my insurance and my husband's insurance. Yes, their dad is ordered to pay, but he doesn't, so we take care of it. They are more important than the pettiness.
2007-10-26 13:10:01 · answer #4 · answered by az_mommma 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as the kids are covered by the insurance, then yes.
2007-10-26 13:00:05 · answer #5 · answered by lady_phoenix39 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends on the situation but if she lost her insurance or something and you still carry ins on them then i would say yes. when there are two ins policies in place usually the primary is billed first then the other secondary one is billed second and in doing that you can avoid out of pocket expenses. I wish my ex had ins on our child.. the out of pocket co pays and others are killing me.
2007-10-26 13:07:48 · answer #6 · answered by Michelle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes she can take the kids any time they need medical as long as its court ordered by the judge that you carry ins. for the children.
2007-10-26 13:03:01 · answer #7 · answered by lisa h 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does it really matter as long as your children as healthy, just be lucky shes only using your information for your children
2007-10-26 17:50:53 · answer #8 · answered by Jay 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-10-26 13:00:48 · answer #9 · answered by strandlock 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope! you don't have rights to sign any legal documents with his name on it. you are the EX.
2007-10-26 13:00:58 · answer #10 · answered by queen_k0302 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋