Asked the question earlier whether those who supported Abortion were proud to support the greatest Genocide in Human History. Of course a bunch said it's not Genocide,so what do you call it when you kill 43 million children per year world wide. And what do you call it when we have killed over 49 million in the US since Roe-V-Wade? Sounds like Genocide to me.
2007-10-26 12:47:51 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Some people will say its murder some wont to make them feel better at night. Bottom line is a womans right to choose should end when a baby is there. Its murder to remove it plain and simple. The child they destroy can not only feel the pain as recent studies show (after a certin amount of time in which case thats the time most people get aborted it isnt always immediate) But if people insist on legal murder i should have the right to kill that guy who i dont like. I mean its ok technically he is just cells. Does that logic make sense? What if that child they kill would be one of the most influental people in society but not it wont happen because they are in a garbage can. At least put them up for adoption. Roe vs Wade needs to be overturned immediatly. A fetus is not a child because its not developed? What about retarded people they didnt develop fully or properly lets just kill them too.
2007-10-26 13:11:37 · answer #1 · answered by SS4 Elby 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Well of course abortion is a sin and is like killing living things. But when a baby is inside the body, it isnt a baby rather just a fetus. So technically its like killing an animal, not a human. Genocide is the act of killing humans in a mass number. Also there are positive sides to abortion, which makes it non-genocidal. The first I believe is that abortion helps people by making them not go through the problems if they had the children. Secondly, as Marx stated that overpopulation will eventually become a genocide between people for the main topic food. Another is that now we can use the fetus to study on stem cells. There are more and I would love to write but no!
2007-10-26 12:54:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Yes, because the victims have no choice...and Abortion alone is the worst genocide in world history, more than the Jewish Genocide, More than the Native American Genocide, more than the African Amrican Genocide more than every Genocide in our Nation and the worlds history........How Sick and Sadistic it is.
God help and have mercy on the United States of America!!!
2007-10-26 12:57:06 · answer #3 · answered by Jeremiah Johnson 7 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Aborting a fetus in the first trimester is simply not murder. To call abortion genocide is to cheapen the word for petty political grandstanding.
For the record, I am pro choice but I believe abortion is morally wrong
2007-10-26 12:53:33 · answer #4 · answered by John V 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
You have skewed the argument to meet your own definition. This issue is difficult for all concerned and to change the argument to meet your requirements is not a correct way to argue. A fetus is not a child, and may not be human until much later in a pregnancy. Abortions are terrible things but it's not your place to decide when a fetus becomes a child nor is it your place to call people murderers for making tough decisions about their own lives. Come up with a better argument and maybe we can discuss this issue.
2007-10-26 12:56:54 · answer #5 · answered by Jim C 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
49 million missing Americans: disproportionately poor, sick, and minority.
I don't know about genocide, but the racist, elitist eugenicists must be ecstatic.
Yeah, yet I'm still pro-choice. As horrible as I think abortion is, I don't trust the government getting between patients and doctors.
2007-10-26 12:52:39 · answer #6 · answered by freedom first 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Normally no I wouldn't call it Genocidal unless you consider human babies a group in and of itself, then technically it could be considered Genocide.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-10-26 13:14:01 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Amazing...How we can throw around huge numbers which mean nothing, since the fetus is not an independent human being.
Meanwhile "Based on data reported by CPS agencies in 2001, it is estimated that nationwide, 2,000 children died as a result of abuse or neglect. based on this number, five to six children die each day as a result of child abuse or neglect. Of these fatalities, 85 percent were children younger than six-years-old at the time of their death, and 44 percent were under the age of one."
Let's start taking care of the children that are living in this world. Don't worry so much about theoretical lives lost, there are children being hurt every day.
2007-10-26 12:54:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
They are not people. See Exodus 21:22.
2007-10-26 13:25:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
NOOOOOOOOO because it is not a person, it is a bloodclot, and you as a man, really have NO righht to tell a WOMAn what to do. If the fetus isn't viable outside the body, it is NOT murder!!!! sheesh, you pro-life folks really weird me out.
2007-10-26 12:51:06 · answer #10 · answered by NR77 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋