Would you support President Bush if he attacked Iran?

Question

Iran is supposedly 3 to 8 years away from developing an atomic bomb. Would it be wise to attack Iran rather than negotiate?

Answer 1

No. I do not support President Bush in attacking Iran. They do not pose an imminent threat. We have the ability to monitor them, and to begin the dialogue necessary to repair relations. We must stop this immoral idea that might makes right -- American has never stood for this!

If we continue to give people just cause to hate us (for example, by attacking and occupying a country just for oil) we will NEVER be safe.

We have alienated people in the Middle East (and all over the world) who were once allies, causing people who were never terrorists to embrace extreme, radical ideology. We cannot win with guns alone.

Answer 2

I think that the United States should look into balancing more things worldwide. You cannot be a world superpower if you spread your troops all over the middle east and have them fighting to stop weapons of mass destruction. Other countries are going to just start making them. What needs to be done is peaceful talks, and trade agreements that will help eachothers economies. If you increase trade and work together more gets solved. Why other countries develop big weapons is in the event that they are attacked, or want to wipe someone out usually. We have them for protection and don't use them unless attacked. But other countries develop them for the same reason, but the problem is their leaders are unstable. If you look at the world, you would actually be amazed at how many countries hate america, for religious or whatever reason. I still believe the third world war will be a because of religion, and its already starting to look more and more like that! I would support governor bush if he decided that it was a good idea to attack if the reasons were legitamate, not like they were with iraq. If they had the proof, then yes I would, but would push for talks first.

Answer 3

Yep, as long as he doesn't use the Bill Clinton strategy of one cruise missle into a closed aspirin factory and then go looking for an intern.

Answer 4

Well I wouldnt support it in theory....but since im 20 I'd almost certainly be fighting (no way we escape the draft if we invaded Iran) I would have to support it physically

Answer 5

I believe that nobody should support a criminal country, and it's insane leaders crusading and bombing other countries just because they are scared. If Americans had any thing hanging between their legs they would have ended this administration years ago but the fact is americans are sissys and slaves to the gay corporate criminals

Answer 6

I for one wish he would hurry up and do it.
Now tonight. Stop playing with me and do it.
turn on FNN and see what the Isrealis did to a missile site in Syria. Of course there is only a hole in the ground so who can really say what was there. The Syrians aren't talking.

Answer 7

I wouldn't support Bush if he paid me...Oh Wait he already did....NO!

Answer 8

No one in its sound mind will support this blood thirsty monster Bush to attack another country. Only evil Republican-Neocons and their corporate buddies which are making huge profits on wars will instigate Bush to start another war. And of course as usual there are also ever present useful idiots which love to see wars on TV so that they will support criminal Bush.

Answer 9

No, but then I haven't supported any of his crimes against humanity.

Mass murder: always wrong.

Answer 10

Iran is a much bigger threat than Iraq ever was. They will NOT negotiate. I support whatever decision is made when it comes to dealing with Iran.