2007-10-26 09:32:59 · 7 answers · asked by vaar69 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
He told people in a crowd as he spoke "Shut UP" as they asked that question... fur up as usual. Today on ABC News ...
Alot more than has been/or ever will be disclosed. His top Aide Sandy Berger removed documents just prior to th 9/11 Commission Inquiry from the National Archives.
2007-10-26 09:40:23 · answer #1 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
There are 3 solutions here... a million) The censorship is of the media, and is left-wing, consequently left financed, and could extra help the leftist time table's.... 2) The above answer additionally applies to the fake commercial of all of the political BS to the final public. maximum surely everyone seems to be conscious that media merchants are that of WWF or however they call it now-- Staged for left-wing administration. surely everyone that's no longer a libertarian and conservative, or the two% of 'others' void out all factors of political correctness to replace it with propaganda that may additionally help and help their destiny 'handouts.' 3) time beyond regulation, i do no longer think it would have relatively mattered if Clinton released him or no longer. Osama might have got here across somebody to do the activity with equivalent or greater credentials. 9/11 became destined to ensue. And, in spite of the undeniable fact that Clinton's antisocial strikes in choose for this actual terrorist did no longer something yet inflict better harm and set-back, it became incredibly inevitable for the plan to be performed... ultimately. --Rob USMC
2016-10-14 03:16:03 · answer #2 · answered by leckie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not very, in my opinion. I believe responsibility for 9/11 rests on the hijackers.
2007-10-26 09:42:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
1st of all, I am an uber conservative.
Now having said that, I don't say he was "responsible" for 9/11, but during his presidency, the terrorists became more emboldened to hit us, as they saw that if we "hit back", the response wasn't all that strong.
No one could have seen this one coming.
So, was he "responsible" for it? No
But he didn't do enough to stop them when he could have.
2007-10-26 09:57:29 · answer #4 · answered by Mark A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill Clinton is an idiot.
In my opinion.
2007-10-26 09:40:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Just as responsible as either Bush.
2007-10-26 10:01:20 · answer #6 · answered by skaizun 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no ore and no less than any president since 1968.
2007-10-26 09:55:56 · answer #7 · answered by BRYAN H 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋