Which Native American tribes did La Salle encounter?

Question

And don't tell me, "I'm not going to do your homework for you," because this is a CAP project which means computer assisted project. I'm asking ya'll here, as well as using Google, Wikipedia, and my Texas History textbook.

Answer 1

Stranded in Texas: The French expedition built a fort at the mouth of the Lavaca River, and explored the area. The last remaining ship was wrecked by a drunken pilot in April 1686, stranding the French in Texas. The 20 men traveled up the Lavaca River, trying to locate the Mississippi River so they could follow it north into the French missions in the Great Lakes region. Most of the men in this expedition died, and the 8 survivors returned to the fort in October, 1686. On a second try, La Salle and 17 others set out (25 people remained at the fort); in a few months, a group of five mutineers shot and killed La Salle (near Navasota, Texas) on March 19, 1687. They left his body for the animals to eat. The rest of the expedition made it to Montreal in 1688, but those at the fort were killed by the Karankawa Indians.

La Salle sent Michel Aco and Father Hennepin on an expedition to the upper Mississippi, while he himself went back to Fort Frontenac for supplies. After La Salle's departure Tonti was attacked by hostile Iroquois and was forced to flee the settlement. La Salle, returning, found the Illinois posts deserted. He set out to find Tonti and also organized (1681) a Native American federation of the Illinois, the Miami, and smaller tribes to fight the Iroquois.

Answer 2

Anishinaabeg tribes in MI

Answer 3

humorous, you will pay attention assorted human beings declare they are "section interior reach American" yet once you ask them which certainly one of their ancestors became an incredibly known member of a tribal usa, they in many instances would be unable to do it. it form of feels to be the tale of "Indian blood" that they latch onto as their pseudo-id, somewhat than having genuine tribal association. you would be unable to deny who you're in case you genuinely be responsive to your ancestors and that they have got been contributors of tribal countries, yet it incredibly is not in many instances the case with those form of claims. only check out any Dr. Henry Louis Gates undertaking in this project and he discusses this phenomenon each and each time. i seem around on the powwows I attend and spot somewhat some blended Black-interior reach little ones and that i could assume they actually be responsive to who their interior reach kin are, and no-one denies them their prestige as tribal contributors. yet, I see them as completely distinctive than the straight forward Black American claiming some imprecise "Cherokee blood" or some distant "Indian blood" from someplace lower back on their mysterious, unnamed genealogy.

Answer 4

From what I remember from my history class, he came across the Karankawa.

Answer 5

Yo momma's tribe !