Dred scott decision research paper? or the donner party?

Question

we're writing a research paper in english, and i think i want to write mine on the dred scott case, but i'm not sure what i want to try to prove, does anyone have any ideas?, my other topic was the donner party, so if you dont have any ideas for arguements on the dred scott case..anybody have any ideas for the donner party?

Answer 1

If I were doing it, I'd go with the Donner party. There's almost nothing you can say about the Dred Scott decision that's not been done to death or is too inflammatory to say.

There's a lot to say about the Donner party other than the obvious issue of eating the flesh of dead humans to stay alive (there is no evidence anyone was killed for food). For example, you could discuss the relative wisdom of people who stayed in the camp and people who tried to walk out. You could explore whether they got bad advice or ignored good advice (or both).

Another thing that would make me decide that way is that there should be good web sites to use for information (not just opinion sites, but fact sites). I know PBS did a good documentary on the Donner Party, so check PBS.org. Also, see Donner Memorial State Park's site. Some links below.

Answer 2

The Dred Scott determination reported: A slave remained a slave decrease than Federal regulation,everywhere he would desire to be interior the U. S. at any given time,even in a loose State the place slavery became banned. Slaves have been sources,and not electorate,and as they weren't electorate,that they had no rights decrease than regulation to hold any type of courtroom case everywhere in us of a. using fact the form in specific protects sources,a slave remains the valuables of their proprietor in any respect situations and everywhere decrease than Federal US regulation. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 became for that reason unconstitutional. The implication of all this became that slavery and slaves became for that reason criminal throughout the time of the U. S.,and this unfold out the possibility that professional slavery Southerners would desire to apply the courts to get slavery prolonged in to loose States and into US Territories and states shaped from them interior the destiny.

Answer 3

I HAVE DONE A TERM PAPER ON DRED SCOTT AND THE THING MOST PEOPLE OVERLOOK IS THAT THE SUPREME COURT IN THE FORM OF CHIEF JUSTICE ROGER TANEY GAVE THE DECISION IT DID AS A MEANS OF PREVENTING THE SECESSION OF THE SOUTHERN SLAVE HOLDING STATES. IT WAS GOODFOR 10 TO 15 YEARS AND THEN THEY SECEDED ANYWAY.