English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What High Crimes or Misdemeanors has he presented?

Do you realize impeachment doesn't mean removal from office.
Remember Clinton was impeached?

2007-10-26 08:22:34 · 34 answers · asked by Moody Red 6 in Politics & Government Politics

Wiz: Clinton Lied Unde Oath!

2007-10-26 08:33:12 · update #1

Under oath! get it?

2007-10-26 08:33:46 · update #2

Zinger: Congress took us to war, Bipartisan effort, so should all of congress be impeached?

2007-10-26 08:35:15 · update #3

Don C: If this were true, don't the Liberals have good attorney's?

2007-10-26 08:37:19 · update #4

Flipper: I can't believe that answer, stupid, eh?

2007-10-26 08:38:46 · update #5

rhio9: well, I started to look at your link, but was put off by the Connecticut cowboy stuff. President Bush 's family moved to Texas when he was only 7 years old. They couldn't even get that fact straight!

2007-10-26 08:46:01 · update #6

34 answers

They feel he has done bad things and he is incompetent,

although it is called displacement when you blame someone for something some one else did.

Example Then President Clinton talked up WMD as did most of the leaders in his party.

So Bush acts on their Intel and they blame him.

and are in denial about what Clinton did and the party members.

That mean denial and displacement are common mental illness in the Democrat party. That is why I guess they always say are you on or off your meed's because that must be their life style.

I hope I cleared this matter up.

2007-10-26 09:15:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Wow. according to Don C, we should drag him out naked and lynch him on the spot. To heck with an impeachment.

IMHO, there isn't much there to justify impeachment. He's made tough calls, not all of which were correct. This is SOP for leadership though. Not everyone will agree or even understand rationale for his decisions. Furthermore, average folks don't have enough info to make an informed decision.

e.g. Going into Iraq was the correct thing to do strategically. It isn't popular, but it is the right decision from a long-term perspective.

We are at war now- not with an individual country- but with an ideology. It is a difficult time indeed. It would help if there were less partisan bitching and more awareness of the situation.

2007-10-26 08:40:57 · answer #2 · answered by Capt Jack 2 · 2 1

Because we're in an "illegal" war. Even though ONLY Congress has the authority to declare war.

Because President Bush is violating our Constitutional rights. Even though every time you turn around theres another liberal attacking the Free Speech right of someone they disagree with or don't want to hear.

Because President Bush is violating the Constitutional rights of terrorists. Even though Constitutional rights are not extended to non-Americans.

Because President Bush is a murder since Iraqi are dying. Even though its our troops who are pulling the triggers and dropping the bombs, but they support the troops.

Because President Bush stole two elections. Even though it was Democrats who denied the military absentee vote in Florida and there was never any evidence of President Bush stealing an election, thank you John Kerry for that little bit of honesty.

Liberal logic is either incredibly faulty or intentionally dishonest.

2007-10-26 20:06:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Don't see many here Red... can't defend it just babble it. Boy I got a hundred BwClinton ones...

BTW incase you get hit with it... he was Impeached & Dis-barred. Yet he received a 6 yr suspension from practicing law and! he had to agree to end the Whitewater investigation plaguing his administration. Can you imagine such a slick deal? I wonder where Hill places the female Judge from the Starr hearings or moves forward a Arkansas Supreme Court Justice into the hssee for life? SO far no one can report BW has petitioned to re-instated the Law License... not Ark -NY. But he is helping Chelsea against the restaurant hanging a photo incident...go figure !!

edit : enter flip flop and I won't bother to defend each point. FLIP FLOP Hill and Bill have done each and every negative point that is presented and then some... but good answer to your question,atleast one brave one stands firm on his convictions. Bravo ! Yikes as I read on I am incorrect... glad to hear it ! I love learning :)

2007-10-26 08:32:28 · answer #4 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1 1

If the reason was being less than competent, GO FOR IT!
But if that were an impeachable offense, CONGRESS would be in JAIL.
At least Bush has a moral core. Wish I could say that for most of the Democrats.

2007-10-26 14:05:25 · answer #5 · answered by Philip H 7 · 2 0

They don't need grounds, or PROOF of any wrong doing on his part. If they could, they would do more than impeach him. They would hang him in even a more horrifying way, than Saddam Hussein was hung, going by their words of past. Some have shown their complete, and utter hatred of Bush, and anything Conservative through their actions at Universites, Columbia, and American.
(Condoleeza Rice, Karl Rove, and President of the Minutemen, Jim Gilchrist were mobbed by Liberals). Liberals on these occasions showed what they are made of, and their desires for America.


These have been the benefits of liberal education on display this commencement season, as graduating students have risen up against the affront of having to listen to the U.S. secretary of State or a distinguished war hero for a half-hour or so. Students complain that Condoleezza Rice and Sen. John McCain don’t represent them. But since when has it been a requirement that speakers on campus be representative of—in the sense of totally agreeing with—student views?

Rich Lowry-


The Libs didn't mind Iran's Leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when he spoke in our country, in our University. Does this mean Liberals consider HIM their representative?

2007-10-26 08:48:51 · answer #6 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 2 1

Impeachment is the trial which could remove an office holder from office such as the Democrat Representative who was impeached as a Judge and removed from office. He is a crook. So, he ran for Representative and was elected. His name is Alcee Hastings.
While High Crimes and Misdemeanors IS the requirement, there is no requirement of proof other than the vote of the Senate. There is no penalty for perjury and no civil rights protections for the impeachee. That is why it takes a 2/3 majority to remove someone from office. Democrats called Clinton all sorts of bad names for his crimes, but STILL voted to NOT remove him from office.
So, Bush could be impeached. I wish they would, it would reveal volumes to the public about the evil partisan Democrats.

2007-10-26 08:42:33 · answer #7 · answered by plezurgui 6 · 2 2

Grounds??? Who needs grounds when you have a constituency that is as il-informed as the Democrats? A lot of the impeachment talk comes from kids too young to remember the Clinton years/lies/invasions.

2007-10-26 12:00:51 · answer #8 · answered by That Guy Over There 4 · 1 0

I'm sure they can fabricate SOMETHING to go through the motions with, but if they do it will hurt Hillary's chances of winning the Presidency, therefore, no motion to Impeach Bush will ever see the light of day in the House.

2007-10-26 09:07:51 · answer #9 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 2 1

Wow you Lib's are a piece of work


Everything mentioned were acts of making you and your families safe. On 911 day I hoped our country wouldn't be become unsafe and we wouldn't have to pass through metal detectors entering the grocery store.

GWB is a hero

2007-10-26 09:30:40 · answer #10 · answered by Johnny 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers