What are we to make of the latest spin the media and Clarence Mitchell are spoonfeeding us.
Yet another witness has now discredited Jane Tanner's account of the night of 3rd of May.
Add this witness to Gerry McCann and Jeremy Wilkins - makes 3 people who DIDN'T see her.
Was she wearing her invisibility cloak or did she really see the greasy haired man with his bundle, sorry little blond girl in Madeleine's pjs.
******************************************************************
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dsos%2Bmaddie%2Bblog%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4GFRC_enGB204GB204
2007-10-26 08:06:37 · 14 answers · asked by Anna 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It's hard to believe her when she has changed her story that many times.How can you jump from a bundle in a blanket to a blonde child wearing winnie the pooh pjs.Why has this photo fit only came out now.She also said she seen Robert Murat on the same night outside the apartment. The next story will be "the pope done it".It's hard not to be cynical
2007-10-26 08:23:50 · answer #1 · answered by Sally 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Interesting link. Especially the part about Gerry cutting the twins hair before any drug tests were done. Jane McTanner has told so many lies she is a totally uncredible witness. I wonder if she will get a little earner out of the Madeleine "fund"
2007-10-26 16:52:53 · answer #2 · answered by trancebabe 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She's changed her story so many times, I don't believe a word she says. It went from a man carrying a bundle, to a man carrying a child, to Robert Murat carrying a child, to Robert Murat carrying a child in pyjamas identical to Madeleine's. The woman simply isn't credible anymore.
2007-10-26 15:58:25 · answer #3 · answered by flamebolt666 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Take a child from a warm bed having been fast asleep she would have been screaming and flaying her arms and legs about.This therefore destroys the imagine we have seen today dont you think.
2007-10-26 22:39:56 · answer #4 · answered by realdolby 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dont know why but Elsie and Dennis Tanner keeps springing to mind Oh my Im so old
2007-10-26 15:54:44 · answer #5 · answered by charlie 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thats something I hadn't heard before, the teenager having a crafty cig, saw them chatting, and NO jane. What a surprise??
Good link Tilly, cheers.
2007-10-26 15:57:10 · answer #6 · answered by !Lady Stormy! 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No she was meant to check on the kids but she didn't bother to busy drinking or she was getting a leg over.
2007-10-26 17:17:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
is she the one who bears an uncanny resemblance to an angry squirrel...don't mean to be nasty about her, but all she makes me think of is a chittering little red squirrel.
2007-10-26 18:04:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Strange that no one else saw this. You would have thought it would have been reported on the night.
2007-10-26 15:23:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think she was ever a credible witness. If this ever comes to court her testimony will be laughed out of it.
2007-10-26 15:18:46 · answer #10 · answered by Chipmunk 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋